Paskman
Not a user
I watched it on ITV.
0 -0 was a fair result.
Bl**dy ITV HD again?
I watched it on ITV.
0 -0 was a fair result.
No one does it like Sky.
That much is apparent
I can't watch SKY. Tabloid TV run by Murdoch scum.
Mark Lawrenson is a f***ing useless **** and annoys the f*** out of me...and relax
How do they rate how many people watched it o a certain channel then? is it simply number of TVs with it switched on? Because if it is then more than 17.9m watched it on BBC as we had 6 people rounds my mates house! add in all the pubs and other houses with more peeps and voila....alot more than 17.9m!
The BBC with the exception of Mark Bright, Lawrenson and Shearer produced a very good well cup schedule.
Mark Lawrenson is a f***ing useless **** and annoys the f*** out of me...and relax
And CROOKS.
I can't watch SKY. Tabloid TV run by Murdoch scum.
But their sport production is absolutely superb
Their sport production is absolutely superb, regardless of the 'scum' that run the Company
I watched it on ITV, though switched to beeb for the lineker etc.
why?
Mark Lawrenson is a f***ing useless **** and annoys the f*** out of me...and relax
The production values employed by Sky were largely the same ones employed by the South African production company.
The difference then is down to the punditry.
So for me, it's still 'no thanks, Sky', especially when the chit-chat and the (quite interesting during this World Cup) articles are cut in half by ads.
Well I f***ing love the Sky coverage and am more than happy to pay the subscription. No amount of self-righteous bleating will change this.