Search results

Posts like this miss the point by a distance almost as large as that between the stars. Just because something is unexplained does not mean that it must be a higher power/aliens. Honestly - I don't know for certain what is in those videos (mainly because I can't watch them at work), but that's...

:thumbsup: :drink:

What? I haven't said that at all. Just that if someone has gone to watch the torch relay, they're obviously not a miserable anti-Olympic pessimist...

:dunce: :lolol:

I think it proves the country isn't completely full of miserable, anti-Olympic pessimists... and that's probably a good start.

No, we don't. It's quite possible that life does, or has, existed on Titan. There's even a chance that it's existed on Mars. Nobody is denying this. What does this even mean? We know how far away the stars are, and it isn't by our measure... as the fundamental particles of the universe all...

See, you speak with such certainty in the absence of evidence every time. How do you know I wouldn't like that? I wouldn't, for the record :lolol:

No, I'm not. What I'm "still dealing with" is what has been proven in terms of the laws of physics. What principles? Are you getting this from Star Trek? Wherever your "force" comes from, you still need a force! You're offering nothing, even in theoretical terms, about how the "fabric of the...

No it did not: Large Hadron Collider at CERN: Einstein 'was right all along' - Telegraph While it's possible, even probable, that you missed this (the media tends to ignore 'boring' science news) it is typical of how conspiracy theorists in general act: Push big on any supporting evidence...

Are you basing your claims on this one quote, or claiming you understand the equivalence of energy and mass? One quote from one scientist - a man who also, separately, claimed that matter did not come from "vibration" but from consciousness itself - proves nothing. Science doesn't work on...

Correct - we do not have to assume that, and we shouldn't. But the forces of acceleration are still a fact - not the force to accelerate any starship, but the force that the acceleration would inflict upon anything being accelerated in such a way - and you seem to be conveniently ignoring this.

Blimey, where to start? Do you need the basics? Do you know what an electron is? Do you know what a proton is? Do you know how the three forces hold them together (gravity not playing a part here)? Do you know that they are made of quarks? Do you know that atoms are combined to make new elements...

No. You seem to completely misunderstand the notion of the word "see", not to mention what an electromagnetic wave is. Yes, our own eyes can only detect a certain wavelength. But we can not only detect, but produce electromagnetic waves of any wavelength we desire. If love, hate and "healing"...

:lolol: Let me guess... my own research but only from sources that you approve of? You don't even know your history, suggesting that the transistor was invented after nuclear fission and after the war?! And what the hell does "frequency of consciousness" even mean. Just like dingodan -...

Buzzwords; nothing but scientific buzzwords. Do you even know what an atom is? What it contains? How those individual components come together to give it its structure? I fear you don't, as you couldn't possibly believe this pseudoscientific rubbish if you did.

No need to insult or call you a nutjob, it's easy enough (and much politer) to just point out the obvious flaws. The silicon chip didn't "appear". The transistor was developed (no controversy there), and was made smaller through understanding, essentially, of quantum physics. Then you put lots...

No. Even in quantum physics light speed cannot be broken. Even if they have, they still have the choice of either travelling for literally thousands of years to get here, or being torn apart by the acceleration that would be required to get here any quicker.

Again, serious questions, and it would be interesting if you could give sensible answers: 1) On what basis were any of these impossible without alien help? 2) If they are impossible without outside help, how did the first alien civilisation discover them?

Serious question and not taking the piss - what does this mean? What do you mean "frequency"? This doesn't make any sense in the normal definition of the word - so if you've copied it from elsewhere, where's the link? Or if it's your own words, what do you mean?

:lolol: That's the most ridiculous bit of it all. Intelligent life has evolved to the point where it can develop interstellar travel, but can't develop a better mode of communication than messing around with farmland?