Var did exactly what it was designed for.
'Craig, I think you made a ricket...have a look'
Admittedly, their penalty could have not been given, you can see why it was, but to award a penalty for the ball hitting a players face? :shrug:
Strange how everyones view is different. I thought he had a good game, and VAR did exactly what it was there for.....even if both decisions were against us!
Oh, how far we've come in the last few years. We go to stamford bridge and get upset when we leave with nothing!
There aren't many free hits for us anymore....maybe man city away and we 'expect' to lose at villa park.
Ref did ok if slightly lenient, quite a bit of rough housing let go in the...
I'm going to go with RDZ on this one, he seems to know what he's doing. I reckon he's picked the available players to play a certain way. I reckon more longer balls from the keeper down the flanks. Probably because he sees chelsea keeping a high line
I didn't understand a word of that!
What are the 1. somethings? What are the real odds, you know 2 to 1, 3 to 1 odds on? Please explain it in laymans terms(English)
It's about time this sort of behaviour led to the club involved being thrown out of European competition.
In reality, they will probably ban English clubs, so as to say they've dealt with the problem of thuggery on European nights in England
I used an age old scientific formula to come up with 10.
I printed out the six matches, with the total points, put a blindfold on and stuck a pin in one.
Unfortunately, there was blood loss, as I missed the paper and stabbed my leg...plus I used a knife and not a pin!
The blood was mostly on...