Search results

ah yes because previous generations were never famed for getting involved in trouble at the footy…

yes it is relevant. why should today’s 18 year olds be gleefully volunteered for national service by older generations that said generations haven’t had to do it themselves? is it because they’re ‘stroppy and entitled’ and more lacking in disciple or whatever than their elders? that narrative...

absolutely bonkers policy, aimed at those fantasising about younger generations doing national service despite never having done it themselves

not a particularly high bar

yes i’d be surprised if contingency options weren’t being looked at. i think potter will definitely be one, and i don’t think i personally would mind that, but given how it’d polarise the fanbase i can’t see it. and also, it does just feel a little bit lazy. i think gallardo is definitely worth...

after inevitable FA cup final defeat certainly makes the alleged mckenna interest make sense. think he’ll be holding out for united now

no idea what to make of that man utd interest but with this, please bear in mind romano will spin the story whatever way chelsea tell him to.

jesus christ, JUST LEAVE THE GAME ALONE!!!

it was literally printed in the athletic that there was a rift over transfer policy. the evidence of him being unhappy was simply watching any interview or press conference for the last three months

i’m not saying the odd crackpot hack won’t look on here every now and then. but the stories about RDZ being unhappy and there being a rift between him and the board weren’t reported because of what was said on here, they were reported because they were true

it’s a forum, people will post stuff they hear on a forum. 90% of rumours are usually derided immediately on here anyway with immediate cries of “west ham/villa/everton written all over it” or “if it hasn’t come from naylor then it’s not happening”, so if people are still treating them as gospel...

steve bruce at 33/1

hearing on the grapevine that bozza’s car has signed for chelsea

is that player specific decisions or simply which positions the club need to buy? because if it’s the latter, i wouldn’t blame him. squad planning at chelsea has been ludicrous to say the least

‘mutual consent’ but i think we all know what that means. ridiculous even for boehly, considering they’ve been playing very well recently and finally looked like clicking. i’d take poch in a heartbeat, it would be an amazing appointment actually. especially as we’ll doubtlessly see...

good job gillingham or port vale aren’t allowed to play FA cup replays anymore or else this wouldn’t be possible! three cheers for our premier league overlords!! :clap::clap::clap:

yes. very unlikely scenario but him leaving for chelsea will never undo what he did for us whilst a player

voted yes as i trust tony and therefore instinctively trust the decisions he makes. only time will really tell though

that’s the same number that got signed last summer

be interesting to see what becomes of sarmiento if mckenna is brought in. he’ll have had a very good look at him over the last few months