But, what Hotchilidog is saying, is that west ham did nothing wrong, and that the Tevez agreement with Kia Joorabchian only put in writing, the "gentlemens agreements" that are present in any loan deal. What I want to know is, what were they actually guilty of?
If this is the case, why were West Ham fined the £5m, and why did they agree compensation with Sheffield? If Tevez was eligible to play, then surely that is that. How was the arrangement any different than any other loan agreement. What about Phil Neville's own goal for Everton against Man Utd...
Get behind him right from the start at Orient tomorrow. If we get good results and play attractive football, we will want him to stay and he will want to stay.
Haven't they got cameras on the A23, so they can check who's coming to Brighton for party conferences and things. Can't they put them to good use and do some Gannon spotting.