Search results

Oh no. I did not know that existed. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Much appreciated.

Thanks AZ. Hope you are keeping well. Have you seen this image before?

Front row: Mark Fleet, Matthew Wilshire, Mickey Thomas, Jimmy Case, Gary Stevens, Mike Bailey (manager), Gerry Ryan, Don Shanks, Steve Gatting, Michael Robinson, Neil Smillie.

Thanks!

Yes. Relegations and promotions come and go.

They don’t seem to have a problem with me using the name though. I think they realised that Seagulls TV is the best name, better than Seagulls World and Seagulls Player, so they thought they’ll have that now. Their main problem seems to relate to the video. They and the broadcasters can’t make...

For example, they put the 3-1 game with Everton in 1981/82 on their pay site but it’s free to view on YouTube.

I’ve not supplied the club with any footage so anything they put behind their paywall that is from the Goldstone era is readily available elsewhere on the internet if you look around.

I haven’t supplied the club with any footage. So if it’s on their website, I think you’ll be able to readily find it elsewhere. All they’ve done is downloaded it from somewhere and put it behind their paywall.

And the club have the cheek to call their channel Seagulls TV and want me to supply them with the same videos they’ve asked me to take down...

I don’t think there has been any misunderstanding. The club have informed me that some broadcasters have objected to the channel and have passed on the information that the channel should be closed by me or face being closed with an infringement notice served. The club have behaved in a polite...

Without divulging the exact detail, the club have offered to work together in some way. But things wouldn't be as easily accessible or complete as now. They have not been heavy handed in their communication.

Nearly 500 videos there! Would be great.

The issue seems to be more with the content than the name, although the name may have meant that broadcasters thought it was the club running it and therefore contacted the club as first port of call.

Thanks.

The message has been a request by broadcasters to take down the site rather than have the club take over the channel.

There has been some communication from the club and the tone has been softly softly and amicable. I'm probably not in a position to reveal the content of that discussion here other than to state the message there is pressure to take down the channel coming from broadcasters.

Gonzalez?

Is this similar to the Posh Spice story of Victoria Beckham claiming ownership of Posh and challenging Peterborough over their use of it even though they had been using it longer?