You said "Pretty sure anyone can get either disease so therefore cannot be racist."
By the same rationale, anyone could be a slave so it is perfectly fair game to use slavery to abuse black people.
At the risk of hijacking this thread, again I'm not sure this was the case. When the election was called May was looked on far more favorably by the public at large than Cameron was in 2015. Cameron in 2015 had the potential millstone of 5 years of a pretty unpopular Government. May deliberately...
Of course it was penalties. The Tories have had to bribe the DUP and are scared stiff of doing anything too contraversial for fear it gets voted down. It's a far cry from the manifesto.
In your opinion, Corbyn is a lot worse than what we have now, fine.
But that wasn't the point I was...
Which is less stupid than saying a party leader who increased his party's vote share dramatically is putting people off voting for the party.
And to make your analogy accurate if you look at the odds 6 weeks before the election it was akin to Barnet losing a cup tie to Arsenal on penalties. In...
Hindsight. Before the campaign most observers thought they'd do very well if the Tories had a majority of 50.
A more centrist candidate went into an election with a poll lead in 2015 and lost.
So it seems to be the opposite of what was being said above. He actually managed to get people...
You said there's all these people not voting Corbyn, yet they got far more votes than 2015. That's the point I was addressing
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
So how come more people voted Labour in 2017 than 2015 then?
And that was before people really got to see what a farce this Government is. The timing of that election makes more and more sense as the days roll by. I shudder to think what would have happened if we'd given this shower a 100 seat...
Good to see looney has moved this one on to - 'Is racism really THAT bad' and 'It's ok to be racist if you have been annoyed by a football match or are pissed'
The £100 was a ticket + train thing, maybe more £90 then. I'm not arguing that it's bad value really, just perhaps my days of blowing that sort of money on a show might be past me.
I'm desperately thinking of a reason not to spend £100 before I've even got in the door at an AEG all-dayer where they'll be no readmittance and hideously overpriced food and drink but I'm not sure it's really possible with that lineup. I'll be mithering all day no doubt.