Search results

I was about to post the same. But Dunk said in an interview a couple of weeks back that JPVH was most improved player and who are we to argue :shrug: He also said that he felt sorry for JPVH because RDZ was on his case every minute of every day when he first arrived :lolol:

Goodnight did that out of choice in front of the Palace fans a few weeks back. I wonder if he has a touch of the Maupay's :lolol:

Now the prisons are full, the justice system is falling apart and the police are so underfunded that they can't manage, dump the ASBOs on the army type thing :wink:

Soft red. He got the ball and caught the player on the follow through. Under today's rules, it's a red. Bit frustrating that it gets the same penalty as the Holgate assault on Mitoma though.

On to the important stuff. What's the queue like at Mill Road ?

Whenever one of them makes a mistake :wink: I prefer Steele at the moment, but Bart is the future. (I still find it quite amusing that RDZ's requirement that goalkeepers are footballers is still thought of as radical :lolol:)

Numbers of staff (whether through National service or otherwise) isn't the limiter in technology, drones, espionage etc. It's budget constrained, something that isn't fixed by spending yet more money kitting out, training and maintaining a few hundred thousand conscripts.

Sorry, that was a typo. Generals trying to justify increasing their forces isn't really news, and there's absolutely nothing there about making Britain safer :shrug:

I'm sorry @Zebedee but what is this 'future conflict with Russia etc' that you are envisaging and think we should be preparing for ? I'm really struggling to think of a situation where Britain's safety will be improved in any way by having a few hundred thousand conscripts dug in along the...

And how would we use these hundreds of thousands of conscripts to ensure we are safer from rogue states' cyber attacks exactly. Is it the Monkey/Keyboard/Shakespeare principle :laugh:

Because your 'issue' isn't an issue. It is very simple bullshit thrown out by two of the most dishonest, incompetent, self serving, vacuous, duplicitous 'politicians' I have ever had the misfortune to experience, in a desperate attempt to feign some sort of relevance with their target...

Christ, as if it's not enough that he's not on your case every minute of every day at training :facepalm: Surely you could appeal to HR :lolol:

Sitting Tory MPs are so desperate they are now reverting to 'hate crimes'. The three posts above are clear unequivocal proof. I'm guessing we'll find out whether the British judiciary is independent of the political intentions of the Government ? I don't know why i put a question mark. Anyone...

Couldn't agree more with your second sentence. I do wonder who made this case so different from all the other cases (approx 400 currently) of British citizens coming back having supported (or, like the majority, actually fought) for ISIS and have been dealt with by the British judiciary ??? Who...

Now I've translated that I wish I hadn't :down:

To make it clear, I have no sympathies for her, however the part I disagree with is that Britain didn't 'dump' the problem on Syria when they withdrew her citizenship. If a Syrian who was a terrorist sympathiser entered Britain illegally, should Syria be allowed to revoke their citizenship and...

The whole thread is about an individual that Britain have 'dumped' on another country and you have yet to answer what should happen in this situation.

Then should Syria should also be able to do the same ? Shemima Begum is in Syria and they don't want her there, she is not a Syrian citizen and doesn't have a visa to stay. She was a British citizen and went from Britain to Syria illegally. Britain then removed her citizenship. So where should...