I’ve never steered clear of the subject on here, but I may have pointed out that by far the biggest loser from administration, was Simon Jordon.
Talking about steering clear of a subject, care to explain why running a wage bill of around 138% of takings was just fine, but 80% is unsustainable?
How so?
What relevance has that point to an observation that, just maybe, it would be odd for fans of one club, who were recently spending nearly 140% of their income on wages, to rip the piss out of a club for spending 80% of their income?
As it happens, whatever ‘Skool’ I attended, at least I was educated enough to know how to spell dichotomy correctly.
Go wipe the egg off your face before everyone else reads your post.
So all of you slagging off Palace for spending around 80% of their income on player wages think that is immoral and unethical?
That looks like 138% of income spent on wages. Obviously that’s morally and ethical different.:)
They’ve basically got three months to earn enough to survive for twelve.
Cornwall is one of the poorest areas in the United Kingdom and actually qualifies for poverty-related grants from the European Social Fund, at least for now.
Just wish they smiled a bit more whilst emptying my wallet.
What are you on about?
He’s been picked for every Ivory Coast squad since he chose them over England and played in eight straight games. He even went out for the last two friendlies despite having been injured the week before playing against Huddersfield IIRC.
The reason he wasn’t picked was...
After being ignored by the England set up for four years, he decided on representing the country of his birth.
He played the next 8 games for them and last season he was injured back in March 2017, so was unable to play in the last two friendlies for the Ivory Coast.
So what exactly were the...
Honest answer, there was absolutely no question that Zaha would be leaving palace in this window, hence my comment some while back.
Watching the media frenzy was amusing mind.