No we ****ing didnt. Thats the point. Yet YOU perpetuate this myth again and again and again.
We penny pinched and it ALL started with not paying Wolves circa 250k for an INTERNATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP PROVEN left back and being very pleased with ourselves that we didnt.
That was the FIRST of many...
Yep indeed. When will people see that the far right and far left are more aligned (eg dictatorships) than anything else. For every Hitler there is a Stalin.
Actually wasnt Hitler the national socialist party or is it me?
Agree. Bloom said in the 1901 original presentations when the Amex was built that "there was a five year plan" and when we are in the Premier League numerous times. Poor fella he probably meant League One which is the Albions natural home.
Pretty pointless now as most champ grounds have massive away ends. Maybe Brentford excepted .
They will only come into play when its Crawley or Bmth away in the cup or a non league side where the away end holds 150 or whatever.
Said it on another thread but with no parachute payments Boro and smaller crowds signing £5m players where the **** is OUR £5m signing?
And with the wages freed up with Kemi, CMS etc.
I await the offifcial response from Chailey Jem with GLEE.
So.
Boro have signed someone for £5m quid.
Where is OUR ****ing £5m signing? As last time I looked they dont get any parachute payments and their crowds are LESS than ours.
Well?
Yep for me it was away at Palace. One nil (FFS header from a corner and down to ten men thanks to Dunks early sending off). Second half kicks off. CMS somehow races thru with the keeper to beat and of course wastes the chance. If we had scored 1-1 down to 10 men. We may have held on. Tails up...
Im surprised at his comments but as CEO I spose he has to talk to us like we are idiots.
However
I am surprised because Barbs went to great lengths (in corp speak distance himself) from the summer recruitment by making it quite clear he was in no way responsible or involved in any way at all...
Im not sure who you mean. After all, in the run in it was very much keep the opposition down to one goal and we wont score at all. 0-1 was very much the order of the day!
Well its a NO* from me.
Why?
Because Barbs has gone to great pains on numerous occasions to make it quite clear that he is NOT responsible for player recruitment only the negotiations when players are leaving!
*im sure there will be desite what Barbs may or may have indicated.