Search results

Saw it described as an "Xbox chat room". :ROFLMAO: Not exactly air traffic control, that's for sure...

The person who spotted the error was the replay operator - literally the only guy involved without 'referee' in his job title.

The transcript in full Assistant Referee 1: Waiting. Delaying, delaying. VAR: Possible offside, Diaz. Assistant Referee 2: Give it Assistant Referee 1: Coming back for the offside, mate. VAR: Just checking the offside. Delay, delay. Give the kick point, let’s go. Kick point please? Referee...

The club doesn't control the wording used by sites/apps! It's largely down to space (or, sometimes, laziness). "Brighton &HA" doesn't look right, so publishers just go with Brighton. And, BTW, the club has trademarks on Brighton & Hove Albion and BHAFC. It would be impossible to protect...

Yes, it's different for upgrades. Yes, it's odd.

I agree with the referral ideal. But the FA don't run the Premier League!

No. It can be anyone. (Up to six times a season, IIRC)

*CRINGE*

I'm saying our issue at Spurs got LOADS of coverage (click here) and our match wasn't live on TV.

Several debatable decisions at Spurs, but ONE which PGMOL later apologised for (Mitoma should have got penalty).

Hmmm... the Spurs v Brighton debacle got loads of coverage. Also, the match yesterday was live on TV around the world, so higher profile. (Oh, and Barber sucked up to PGMOL after their apology - whereas Liverpool are pushing further)

Outrageous!!

Premier League teams can't sue. I wonder if punters can? Would be a great test case... which would presumably lead to PGMOL ceasing to admit mistakes, but still - imagine the drama!!

In this instance - as with Spurs v Brighton last season - PGMOL have admitted a mistake. Human error. Damn right there should be an enquiry!

Another thread on this. Great!

Can I get on this too please?

See also: Golf on the radio. All weekend. WTAF?!