Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Are Labour going to turn this country around?

Is Labour going to turn the country around

  • Yes

    Votes: 128 25.8%
  • No

    Votes: 304 61.2%
  • Fence

    Votes: 65 13.1%

  • Total voters
    497


Commander

Arrogant Prat
NSC Patron
Apr 28, 2004
13,911
London
I don't think it would magically lift the quality of our MPs, tbh, but it would mean that more people would consider a career in politics that currently don't because the money isn't all that high.

I mean do you honestly think we'd see the back of Lee Anderson or that WhatsApp idiot or other hard of thinking MPs, simply by doubling his pay?
It wouldn't improve the quality of the current ones, no. But it would definitely attract better people in the future. £90K is decent money, but it's not exceptional money by any means at all, and would be absolutely nowhere near enough to make me want to go anywhere near that job. f*** that. The fact that you can make more money as a train driver than as an MP is insane.
 




Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
55,278
Surrey
It wouldn't improve the quality of the current ones, no. But it would definitely attract better people in the future. £90K is decent money, but it's not exceptional money by any means at all, and would be absolutely nowhere near enough to make me want to go anywhere near that job. f*** that. The fact that you can make more money as a train driver than as an MP is insane.
I don't disagree with most of this, but I do disagree with you if you think we'll see the back of morons in the commons. Lee Anderson is a prime example - he's been parachuted into a charlatan party as a "man of the peepel" and continues to be an absolute gimp. I can't see how upping the salary for MPs prevents similar charlatan parties from forming in the future. And really, are our MPs any better or worse than those abroad? There's an argument than most are actually better. :shrug:
 


Commander

Arrogant Prat
NSC Patron
Apr 28, 2004
13,911
London
I don't disagree with most of this, but I do disagree with you if you think we'll see the back of morons in the commons. Lee Anderson is a prime example - he's been parachuted into a charlatan party as a "man of the peepel" and continues to be an absolute gimp. I can't see how upping the salary for MPs prevents similar charlatan parties from forming in the future. And really, are our MPs any better or worse than those abroad? There's an argument than most are actually better. :shrug:
I think over a generation, your average class of MP would improve. You'd never get rid of all the ****s though, obviously.

I don't know the answer to your last question, but I do know that our current lot are worse than the generation before them.
 




Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
63,893
The Fatherland
Or better still, reduce the number as you say, but pay serious money for serious quality that are held to incredibly high standards. Actually get our best and brightest going in to politics instead of limited and middle of the road talent.
They said the same about referees when they went fully professional.
 




jimhigham

Je Suis Rhino
Apr 25, 2009
8,272
Woking


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
58,339
Faversham
NHS waiting lists down for the fourth month in a row… and that’s during winter.

Looking forward to the media getting their teeth into getting that story out there. …Oh, wait!

https://www.england.nhs.uk/2025/02/waiting-list-falls-as-nhs-staff-treated-record-numbers-last-year/
It is still a nightmare, but Streeting sounded like someone who knows huis stuff, has short, medium and long term plans, is flexible, and is constantly listening and adjusting, and has 'this must be made to be better' embedded in his core programme.

A million miles from the slogans and gimmicks and immutable cod doctrine (how can a party that has always opposed the NHS have a 'plan' for it?) of the previous government's parade of failure-gimps.
 






Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
24,405
Brighton
It wouldn't improve the quality of the current ones, no. But it would definitely attract better people in the future. £90K is decent money, but it's not exceptional money by any means at all, and would be absolutely nowhere near enough to make me want to go anywhere near that job. f*** that. The fact that you can make more money as a train driver than as an MP is insane.
I guess it’s whether you are motivated by money or service.

There needs to be a balance between the two.

Someone like Farage who has a deep love of money has managed to make politics pay extremely well, he is not bothered by his constituency surgery or taking up issues of individuals, he has way too many media commitments and trips to the US to bother about that. He never turned up to do his job as an MEP either.

I think hard right wingers find it impossible to believe MPs do it for anything other than the money and that hard left wingers can not understand why these roles should not be voluntary.

On reflection, I think we have it about right. Anyone wanting more than £90k pa (bearing in mind ministers get a load more plus MPs have very generous expenses) would be in it for the money, not the concept of service.
 








seagullsovergrimsby

#cpfctinpotclub
Aug 21, 2005
44,032
Crap Town
Looks like they might be hamstrung by having to increase defence spending due to Tango man throwing all his rattles out of his pram
Might need to reverse the Tory employee NI cuts and tell the farmers their inheritance tax will be 40%.
 




WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
28,507
Might need to reverse the Tory employee NI cuts and tell the farmers their inheritance tax will be 40%.

I didn't come here for a lecture in communism.

An election loser to reduce the net pay of 28m?

Well it's only been increased for a few months.

And throwing that couple of quid to the 28M at the last minute before the election certainly didn't turn out to be the Election winner that Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt hoped it would :wink:
 




The Optimist

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 6, 2008
3,043
Lewisham
It wouldn't improve the quality of the current ones, no. But it would definitely attract better people in the future. £90K is decent money, but it's not exceptional money by any means at all, and would be absolutely nowhere near enough to make me want to go anywhere near that job. f*** that. The fact that you can make more money as a train driver than as an MP is insane.
The other thing with the £90k a year is that if you lose your seat at an election you’re out of a job in an instance (is there a severance package?). Most other jobs paying that level don’t tend to come with much risk of losing your job that abruptly.
 


portslade seagull

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2003
18,230
portslade
I didn't come here for a lecture in communism.



Well it's only been increased for a few months.

And throwing that couple of quid to the 28M at the last minute before the election certainly didn't turn out to be the Election winner that Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt hoped it would :wink:
Likewise when they fanfare a 1p cut in personal income tax not sure anybody notices the difference. Would rather it is used towards the NHS, Police and so on rather than a cheap bribe
 


Weststander

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 25, 2011
71,076
Withdean area
I didn't come here for a lecture in communism.



Well it's only been increased for a few months.

And throwing that couple of quid to the 28M at the last minute before the election certainly didn't turn out to be the Election winner that Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt hoped it would :wink:

I was against it .... because the sums didn't add up, we couldn't afford it. It was a political trap, without or with 2024 Tory election success, set to make Labour seem bad if they ever threatened to reverse it, etc.

The media and social media, which has a huge influence on GE's now, would have a field day if "hard working families are hit".

Hence, Reeves it appears isn't reversing it.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
28,507
I was against it .... because the sums didn't add up, we couldn't afford it. It was a political trap, without or with 2024 Tory election success, set to make Labour seem bad if they ever threatened to reverse it, etc.

The media and social media, which has a huge influence on GE's now, would have a field day if "hard working families are hit".

Hence, Reeves it appears isn't reversing it.

Exactly, but what worries me is that we are both fairly normal, run of the mill blokes of average intelligence who could see and understand it a mile off, so who was it aimed at :wink:
 
Last edited:




Weststander

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 25, 2011
71,076
Withdean area
Exactly, but what worries me is that we are both fairly normal, run of the mill blokes of average intelligence who could see it a mile off, so who was it aimed at :wink:

Floating voters who'll happily abandon both Labour or Tory, borne out by Labour being down 8.7% in polling since July. For all the sentiment of better NHS, personal finances/economy has often been a huge driver of voting intentions in the UK (and US). Not so sure about other places e.g. Sweden and Finland?
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
28,507
Floating voters who'll happily abandon both Labour or Tory, borne out by Labour being down 8.7% in polling since July. For all the sentiment of better NHS, personal finances/economy has often been a huge driver of voting intentions in the UK (and US). Not so sure about other places e.g. Sweden and Finland?

I thought we were all floating voters. Certainly i've voted for all the major parties over the years (and I'm pretty sure you said similar), so why didn't we believe in the NI cut ?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here