Greg Bobkin
Silver Seagull
- May 22, 2012
- 16,524
The EV line is to be expected - China is SO far down the road with EVs, battery tech and everything else. Interesting to see how PHEVs hold firm in that period, I would expect them to drop like ICE.
The EV line is to be expected - China is SO far down the road with EVs, battery tech and everything else. Interesting to see how PHEVs hold firm in that period, I would expect them to drop like ICE.
China is coming for Elon. How long can Tesla carry such a ridiculous price tag?The EV line is to be expected - China is SO far down the road with EVs, battery tech and everything else. Interesting to see how PHEVs hold firm in that period, I would expect them to drop like ICE.
I know a guy that uses golf club stock yardages to add distance context to discussions.What a fantastic unit of measurement. Let's have more of these please. (to go alongside the size of Wales, height of a London bus, Olympic swimming pools etc)
You EV disciples looking for a sports EV may enjoy this.
Interesting review leaving me with the impression of all fur coat and no knickers
I agree, it looks like an excellent first itineration but I am struggling to accept having to do a pre flight procedure every single time I start the car, which also applies to ICE cars made after July 24, to turn off the nannying cars have to do these days. This is likely to put me off ever buying a new car again, let alone an EV.I came away from that review feeling like MG were a revised software interface, a fix for seating position, and some suspension tweaks away from having a real hit. Having seen them in the flesh, they have a lot more presence than an MX5 or SLC/Z4.
503BHP and a 3.2s 0-60 time mean it’s considerably faster than all the above, and the Boxster. I suspect the Boxster and the MX5 are better handling, but they’ve been through multiple iterations over decades, this is the Cyberster’s first attempt. I suspect MG will tweak things as required.
I’m not in the market for two seater sports cars, but if I wanted one, the Cyberster is the only choice out there for someone like me who isn’t going back to the combustion engine. For someone who isn’t going full “dab of oppo” like me, it looks fun.
I was going to look up our current prices, but it appears the ID Buzz has been (temporarily?) pulled from our choice.Anyone with much experience of leasing EV through a salary sacrifice scheme and actually managing to benefit from the low BIK and subsequent income tax savings?
My new employer operates a scheme, but the lease company running it (Fleet Evolution) are charging such high prices that it isn't worth it, even with 42% tax/NI taken into account. I got a quote for an ID Buzz, and with their prices the effective net cost is actually £20 a month more expensive than leasing it privately!
Having done a quick Google, it sounds like this is a common feature of companies running EV leasing through salary sacrifice. It's really dissapointing that the tax incentives offered by the government to go electric are just being used to increase the margins of rip-off leasing companies.
It's an odd car because there are many aspects of it that are stunning – as Vicky says in that video, it's RIDICULOUSLY fast – but other elements, such as the screen being hidden behind the steering wheel, are just daft oversights. Pretty much straight after it arrived, I got asked whether it was a Lambo – and that theme continued during the week – so the styling team have clearly done their job. But the menus, screens and overall interior packaging leaves a lot to be desired.I agree, it looks like an excellent first itineration but I am struggling to accept having to do a pre flight procedure every single time I start the car, which also applies to ICE cars made after July 24, to turn off the nannying cars have to do these days. This is likely to put me off ever buying a new car again, let alone an EV.
I may be wrong but I fear the nannying will make drivers even less attentive than so many already are. I still struggle to get my head around using an Ipad screen for virtually all things when using a mobile phone whilst driving is (correctly) banned.
Are you comparing apples?Anyone with much experience of leasing EV through a salary sacrifice scheme and actually managing to benefit from the low BIK and subsequent income tax savings?
My new employer operates a scheme, but the lease company running it (Fleet Evolution) are charging such high prices that it isn't worth it, even with 42% tax/NI taken into account. I got a quote for an ID Buzz, and with their prices the effective net cost is actually £20 a month more expensive than leasing it privately!
Having done a quick Google, it sounds like this is a common feature of companies running EV leasing through salary sacrifice. It's really dissapointing that the tax incentives offered by the government to go electric are just being used to increase the margins of rip-off leasing companies.
Yes, absoultely like-for-like: Same spec, 36 months lease, 10K miles and maintenance included. The quote I had via the scheme was for a gross monthly salary sacrifice of £1382 giving an effective net cost of £904. This was in comparison to a private lease quote of £880 per month.Are you comparing apples?
My Sal Sac (through Ayvens, previously known as Leaseplan) includes insurance, servicing, tyres etc. And there's zero up-front deposit. My only direct costs are electricity and washer fluid.
Just looking at private lease costs for an ID.3 of the same spec as mine, and getting it as close as possible to a like-for-like comparison (3 years, 8000 miles, and a 1 month deposit) it's working out roughly £200 per month more expensive and still doesn't include insurance.
oof.Yes, absoultely like-for-like: Same spec, 36 months lease, 10K miles and maintenance included. The quote I had via the scheme was for a gross monthly salary sacrifice of £1382 giving an effective net cost of £904. This was in comparison to a private lease quote of £880 per month.
To be fair I'd forgotten that the insurance was included in the company scheme. However, I'm late 40s with a clean licence and 15+ years of no-claims, so this would probably only be worth an extra £70-80 per month. And if I left the company within the 3 year lease I'd have to take over the lease and be stuck paying £1382 out of my net income!
From a quick Google, it sounds like this company, amongst others, is known for profiteering off of the goverment's EV tax incentives, so I doubt it's particular to this make/model. It's good to know that there are companies that do enable the end user to get the lion's share of the benefit though. I doubt it'll have much influence in the corporate beast I'm currently employed by, but I'll provide some feedback to the appropriate dept.oof.
Have a feeling this might be an ID.Buzz issue rather than across the board? Or as you suggest, the specific leasing company is taking the mick.
ID.3 private is a little over £500 (36m, 8000m, 1 mth dep, maintenance but w/out insurance), sal sac a little over £300 net all-in. From memory the pre-tax quote wasn't too far removed from the quick search I did for a private quote, so not much (if any) mickey-taking going on. Edit: also, our scheme has a hand-back policy for if I leave the company.
I have an ID3 ... love it (despite some quirks of the computer system I don't like, it's a lovely car).Anyone got an ID7??
Views?
Thanks!
Not any more, sadly – it went back this morning after I spent six months with one. I absolutely loved it on the whole – here are my thoughts (with a final one or two reports to be added...).Anyone got an ID7??
Views?
Thanks!
Funnily enough, that has just replaced the ID.7. It's a huge improvement on the original ID.3, but I already know some things are going to be irritating!I have an ID3 ... love it (despite some quirks of the computer system I don't like, it's a lovely car).