Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Attwell



Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
8,632
Vilamoura, Portugal
I agree with your other points, but I think it was 7 mins 30 seconds. That was still too long and gave muff a chance to equalise. The goal took 1 minute 10, but a goal kick would take 30 so they should've only added 40 seconds for that.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241125-203511_Flashscore.jpg
    Screenshot_20241125-203511_Flashscore.jpg
    266.2 KB · Views: 48




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,610
Goldstone
@Seagull58 The 90+8 there is correct, the corner came in at 97:21 (according to the Sky 30 minute highlights), we headed it clear, and it was volleyed onto the bar at 97:26, and the final whistle was at 97:29 (if the shot had gone in it would have shown 90 +8).
The 90+9 they've put is simply wrong.
 






Flounce

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2006
4,605
Unsurprisingly he was shocking as always. Gave Leicester everything and booked our players for nothing. There are some bad referees in this league but this is the only guy who I’ve ever seen that seems to have some sort of agenda against us.
He gave us f*** all and if there was a way he gave every decision to Leicester. Pedro is a diver but he was fouled quite a few times with nothing given.
 












willalbion

Well-known member
May 8, 2006
1,624
London
He’s a weak ref, let’s not go all Nottingham Forest on this.
 


wellquickwoody

Many More Voting Years
NSC Patron
Aug 10, 2007
13,957
Melbourne
Unsurprisingly he was shocking as always. Gave Leicester everything and booked our players for nothing. There are some bad referees in this league but this is the only guy who I’ve ever seen that seems to have some sort of agenda against us.
I only watched the second half due to time difference etc so had no clue of what May, or may not have happened in the first half. I also try not to blame refs too much as they have a difficult job. But……..

By midway through the second half I was wondering how it was that every time our man went down that play was waved on, but in reverse the offence and resulting free kick were given. This was without any prompting from the commentary team. Then there was the ubiquitous advantage played for Leicester but when it did not work out the play dragged back for a free kick. By the time last quarter of the game was occurring both I and the commentators were picking up on why seemingly innocuous challenges were not only earning Leicester free kicks, but not us, AND we’re also being accompanied by bookings for our players, (Baleba, Weiffer). Thus forcing us into changes of personal to avoid further issues. It seemed that Dunky also got booked just for questioning the ref as captain?
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
14,654
Cumbria
I only watched the second half due to time difference etc so had no clue of what May, or may not have happened in the first half. I also try not to blame refs too much as they have a difficult job. But……..

By midway through the second half I was wondering how it was that every time our man went down that play was waved on, but in reverse the offence and resulting free kick were given. This was without any prompting from the commentary team. Then there was the ubiquitous advantage played for Leicester but when it did not work out the play dragged back for a free kick. By the time last quarter of the game was occurring both I and the commentators were picking up on why seemingly innocuous challenges were not only earning Leicester free kicks, but not us, AND we’re also being accompanied by bookings for our players, (Baleba, Weiffer). Thus forcing us into changes of personal to avoid further issues. It seemed that Dunky also got booked just for questioning the ref as captain?
Dunk got booked for questioning a decison, Baleba got booked for waving an imaginary card, Weiffer got booked for a 50-50 challenge. Vardy didn't get booked for screaming 'F*** OFF' straight at the ref.
 




kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
9,882
Incredible he didn't book any of their players for the multiple fouls they committed in the first half (compare Baleba's second booking v Bmuff!).
 


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
26,330
The club should go through the games he's refed against us and make notes. Something is not right.
I've done it for them.

He's reffed 25 Brighton league matches:

Won: 13
Draw: 6
Lost: 6

'Can you ref us every week...'
 






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,610
Goldstone
I've done it for them.

He's reffed 25 Brighton league matches:

Won: 13
Draw: 6
Lost: 6

'Can you ref us every week...'

How about the decisions he's made?

How about incorrectly sending off Baleba, which then cost us against Southampton?
 










Deadly Danson

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Oct 22, 2003
4,709
Brighton
How about the decisions he's made?

How about incorrectly sending off Baleba, which then cost us against Southampton?
And we had to sub him again today because we couldn't risk Attwell doing it again. I'm just so tired of him choosing to benefit the opposition in every 50/50 decision. Happens consistently and, as I've said before, he's the only ref who's integrity I doubt.
 


zefarelly

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
22,898
Sussex, by the sea
Not today specific . . . . But refs like these, do sometimes let a scene set itself . . .

If you start acting like a f***ing tart, in a cheating kind of way ( they all do it) Ill let it go until you do actually get hurt . . . . .
Or maybe . . . . . ride the brush like a footballer, then when you do get fouled I'll give it . . . . . Before you get hurt.

officiating is sub standard full stop. . . . Largely Because the tails wagging the dog And thats the way the money people like it.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here