clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,969
The reality of course that most of them (the ones who have gone public) are successful in their own right.Victim blaming. The women making complaints want their 15 minutes
The reality of course that most of them (the ones who have gone public) are successful in their own right.Victim blaming. The women making complaints want their 15 minutes
I think we're now up to 17 aren't we?Victim blaming. The women making complaints want their 15 minutes
Nothing to do with the police, nothing to do with the law and nothing to do with a trial.Tongue in cheek . Bit of that going on .
Interesting to see when videos released and police charge
Guilty via media at moment
Illustrates why I have the old loose cannon on ignore.Victim blaming. The women making complaints want their 15 minutes
Excellent point.The reality of course that most of them (the ones who have gone public) are successful in their own right.
.. at a stretch.a TV food presenter.
I don’t think people really understand how TV works TBH. Some even seem to think that him being on the BBC means he’s a BBC employee rather than someone paid by a production company who in turn sell the programme to the BBC.It's probably because some people don't realise when you are watching TV you are watching people at work.
An interesting point.Tongue in cheek . Bit of that going on .
Interesting to see when videos released and police charge
Guilty via media at moment
Yeah, I originally typed “TV chef” but he’s not that either... at a stretch.
I think he's a middle class television execs idea of working class.Yeah, I originally typed “TV chef” but he’s not that either.
Reality tv presenter?
The complaints were made at the time but ignored by those in charge. Now the victims are being listened to, which in turn is giving more the courage to speak up.Nothing to do with the police, nothing to do with the law and nothing to do with a trial.
This is extreme work place bad behaivour.
Can't believe there are a still a few who can't see this.
It's probably because some people don't realise when you are watching TV you are watching people at work.
You do realise the accusers haven't "changed their mind" right?Maybe Pete will have changed his mind in twelve years time? It won’t be so funny then.
Or asking a ghost writer to lick his a***
Tongue in cheek . Bit of that going on .
Yes, I think this is a packaged brand bought in - a product purchased.I don’t think people really understand how TV works TBH. Some even seem to think that him being on the BBC means he’s a BBC employee rather than someone paid by a production company who in turn sell the programme to the BBC.
You've got insider experience. Would you say that the broad issue is the lack of procedures. Or that so many working in the industry are on freelance contracts and so in a highly precarious position making complaining that much more difficult. Or that the procedures are outsourced by the broadcaster to the production company. Or something else?Nothing to do with the police, nothing to do with the law and nothing to do with a trial.
This is extreme work place bad behaivour.
Can't believe there are a still a few who can't see this.
It's probably because some people don't realise when you are watching TV you are watching people at work.
By no means do you have to be famous.I have had sexually innuendo said directly to me from men of a certain age and ladies of a certain age quite a lot of times through my life.
Can someone tell me who I should contact as it appears 30 plus years on I may been Wallaced or do the people who said this stuff needs to be famous for me to gain any traction?