Right Brain Ronnie
Well-known member
Yes, but are you still pretty?I used to be a pretty rapid sprinter when I was a kid and I was half-decent at the longjump.
Now I get out of breath trying to spell 'longjump'.
Yes, but are you still pretty?I used to be a pretty rapid sprinter when I was a kid and I was half-decent at the longjump.
Now I get out of breath trying to spell 'longjump'.
I'm quite impressed by the way you're running in mid air. I see you eschew the conventional foot on the ground running technique used by the other competitors. Was that because you didn't want to get your feet wet?I ran my fastest marathon yesterday at 44.5 years old. Still annoyed with my time, I had a dodgy tummy at mile 13, p!ssing rain for most of run, cramp and hamstring tightness from mile 20. I trained hard but didn't bother with the strength and stretching... next time i need to do that gubbins! So, mine is yet to come i feel, but i guess, for now it was yesterdays effort. I know i could have done better, my time was 4h 27 mins
View attachment 193236
I am older than you, so I "only" had to run sub 3:10. I managed this with 10 seconds to spare in London.This is probably mine too. Although I had to qualify and train for the Boston Marathon TWICE, thanks to Covid. Running two sub 3-hour marathons to qualify, I'm not sure I'll better that.
My son in law is gutted this year as he'd achieved the qualifying time for his group, only to be turned down as they'd lowered it by 3 secs.I qualfied for. and ran. the Boston marathon. For those you do not know, you can only enter Boston with an age/sex related qualifying time. Other than this, f*** all.
Technically, my BQ time was also 3:10, for the time I actually ran it. The cut-off time was 5:29 below that though. I knew I would need a buffer.I am older than you, so I "only" had to run sub 3:10. I managed this with 10 seconds to spare in London.
It was more than 3 seconds. The cutoff was almost 7 minutes below the time you needed to apply (from 5:29 below, the previous year). Maybe he'd missed that by 3 seconds?My son in law is gutted this year as he'd achieved the qualifying time for his group, only to be turned down as they'd lowered it by 3 secs.
I know he was really gutted. He was 6 mins 30secs inside the old time but apparently it was a record year for people applying. He’s going to try again next year as I believe his time stands for two years?Technically, my BQ time was also 3:10, for the time I actually ran it. The cut-off time was 5:29 below that though. I knew I would need a buffer.
It was more than 3 seconds. The cutoff was almost 7 minutes below the time you needed to apply (from 5:29 below, the previous year). Maybe he'd missed that by 3 seconds?
I know he was really gutted. He was 6 mins 30secs inside the old time but apparently it was a record year for people applying. He’s going to try again next year as I believe his time stands for two years?