I thought this was going to be a thread about Kylie
Whilst I prefer to stay humble and respectful I couldn’t help but glut when the decision went our way.Yes, it took ages to get to the bottom of this.
I'm inclined to agree. Mitomas incline could easily have put his armpit offside on another day. Stick to feet I say.Have always said like Tennis and cricket off sides should be based on foot position and this photo shows how easier it would be if this was so
yes, they were trying to see if there was a crack in their defenceIt took an eternity for VAR to cheek if it was offside or not.
You've got a cheekI honestly thought it was offside first. Seemed like a bit of a bum rap for Bournemouth.
I sphinc you’re right.yes, they were trying to see if there was a crack in their defence
The second half had only just started as well, early back doors.yes, they were trying to see if there was a crack in their defence
Yes, I watched the replay on TV many times, but couldn’t work out the path of the ball through the defenders. It looked diagonal, but that pic makes sense of it.The vision and perfect weight on that pass by JP to completely dissect their defence was just pure FILTH. That pic captures it perfectly.
Yes, if they changed the offside law so it was only the position of player's feet which determined offside, then it would be much more straightforward to judge and also much more in keeping with the intent of the offside law.......So if Mitoma had been leaning forward a little more a brilliant goal could have been chalked off - his feet are miles onside. The offside law is an ass .