......... and the return of the stolen children.The Russian soldiers would have to leave Ukraine as a non-negotiable pre-condition for aid.
......... and the return of the stolen children.The Russian soldiers would have to leave Ukraine as a non-negotiable pre-condition for aid.
I think Shoigu is pretty much the exception. The only other ethnic person in a high position I can think of is Kadyrov. Russians make up the majority of the population anyway.That's interesting, didn't know he was Tuvan. So, "I've made it to the elite and you're never gonna get there".
Latest from Paul Warburg (I'm part way through) is all about their economy and how it looks supper rosy to many citizens at the moment (flush with sign up and death benefits from the military). Maybe an example of catastrophe theory soon to happen
I am not surprised by this as if my memory serves me well it was developed by a British-Ukrainian software engineer and at the start of the conflict they were offering a lot of help to Ukrainian people here in Poland.For a bit of fun I’ve just tried to open a Ruble account on my Revolut account but surprisingly it’s one of the few currencies they don’t offer ( their systems probably don’t have the capacity to keep up with it!)
More economics for you:
Blimey. According to him, if the exchange rate hits even the 1 Rub = 0.0083 USD, it's game over. If think he said even if it hits the 80s (0.0089999) it's game over.
Unfortunately, he didn't elaborate on what 'game over' would elicit.
For a bit of fun I’ve just tried to open a Ruble account on my Revolut account but surprisingly it’s one of the few currencies they don’t offer ( their systems probably don’t have the capacity to keep up with it!)
Ah yes. I think I might have tuned out a bit at the beginning - sorry. I was watching the cars drive behind him.Pretty sure he meant that the Russian economy would collapse (like it did in the 90s) to the extent that internal issues would trump continuing a war outside its borders (as happened with the Roman Empire).
Whether he's right on the figures, I have no idea, but this is the general point that a few of us have been making - if the Russian economy does collapse, and they can't afford to pay their troops, then surely the war effort collapses too?
I wonder how China feel about it all? Will they be fine with Russia losing, and as they collapse internally, China getting old land back? Or do they want to spend big to try and help Russia win?
Regarding paying troops, yes, but maybe not immediately. Paul Warburg details how Russia is withholding payments to soldiers (recruitment bonuses, salaries and yes, death benefits for as long as possible), to gain interest on that money to keep the show on the road.
I hope so. Either way I'm sure they'll be expecting 'their' land back, either because Russia collapses or because it's part of a deal to help Russia.I hope and believe that China are playing a long game to get their land back. There's not much point in continuing to support a failing Russia, with the risk of secondary sanctions. Western markets are far more valuable than Russia's trade.
Nah...0.8 of a cent just felt like a decent, round, psychological final tipping point to meBlimey. According to him, if the exchange rate hits even the 1 Rub = 0.0083 USD, it's game over. If think he said even if it hits the 80s (0.0089999) it's game over.
Unfortunately, he didn't elaborate on what 'game over' would elicit.
@raymondo, I remember you saying something about 0.8 of a cent. Have you been taking a sneaky look at this monetary economist's videos?
Some good detail on what Russia needs to import (this was originally posted on the Georginio Rutter thread):
I dunno...Russian rules are different to ours:Pretty sure he meant that the Russian economy would collapse (like it did in the 90s) to the extent that internal issues would trump continuing a war outside its borders (as happened with the Roman Empire).
Whether he's right on the figures, I have no idea, but this is the general point that a few of us have been making - if the Russian economy does collapse, and they can't afford to pay their troops, then surely the war effort collapses too?
I wonder how China feel about it all? Will they be fine with Russia losing, and as they collapse internally, China getting old land back? Or do they want to spend big to try and help Russia win?
Someone asked what my post had to do with Georginio, and @GoldstoneVintage replied:(PS. I didn't know Georginio was an economist)
What's even more nauseating are idiots like Simon Jenkins, who say nothing about 14000 projectiles fired at Ukraine, mainly into civillians, but claim 20 missiles at Russia military installations is a massive escalation.I think you have to remember that he’s full of shit. I suspect he threatens to use nukes on his housekeeper if there’s not enough vodka to go on the cornflakes.
I really don’t understand how anyone’s still falling for the “woah, he’s so crazy and unpredictable” nonsense.
He’s entirely predictable. Everything is described as a red line which if crossed will cause Russia to be forced to escalate against Russia’s enemies.
As each red line is crossed, he says “well you may have crossed that red line, but if you cross this next red line, you will see Russia escalate things against its enemies.”
And repeat ad nauseum. He’s boxed in. He can’t escalate to the point of a nuclear conflict as Russia would be destroyed, he can’t escalate to the point of a regular world conflict without China and Iran joining him. NATO are simply better equipped. I don’t think he’d survive being seen to fail at home in Russia, so we have what we have now.
He’s going to have to take a peace deal of some kind, his country is going down the toilet, he’s going to get taken out from within if something doesn’t give shortly.
I would love to see some red lines from Ukraine, US ...someone other than Pootin.I think you have to remember that he’s full of shit. I suspect he threatens to use nukes on his housekeeper if there’s not enough vodka to go on the cornflakes.
I really don’t understand how anyone’s still falling for the “woah, he’s so crazy and unpredictable” nonsense.
He’s entirely predictable. Everything is described as a red line which if crossed will cause Russia to be forced to escalate against Russia’s enemies.
As each red line is crossed, he says “well you may have crossed that red line, but if you cross this next red line, you will see Russia escalate things against its enemies.”
And repeat ad nauseum. He’s boxed in. He can’t escalate to the point of a nuclear conflict as Russia would be destroyed, he can’t escalate to the point of a regular world conflict without China and Iran joining him. NATO are simply better equipped. I don’t think he’d survive being seen to fail at home in Russia, so we have what we have now.
He’s going to have to take a peace deal of some kind, his country is going down the toilet, he’s going to get taken out from within if something doesn’t give shortly.
As all good parents will know, red lines, are ... red lines.I would love to see some red lines from Ukraine, US ...someone other than Pootin.
As I've suggested before: " if you hit one more Ukrainian hospital or apartment block with a missile or drone...we're dropping the Kerch Bridge"...and then do it.
I would love to see some red lines from Ukraine, US ...someone other than Pootin.