Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
Starmer and Pottymouth are out to change that, don't worry about that.Just 5% of this country is built up and urban.
Starmer and Pottymouth are out to change that, don't worry about that.Just 5% of this country is built up and urban.
Ever the optimist....Totally agree
Are you sure about that?No, that's completely wrong.
The bogus asylum seekers are not included in the statistics.Is that a good thing? It is hard to believe 80% are genuine asylum seekers. Our figure is higher than other European countries.
Absolutely no chance. It needs a radical re-think on so many issues. All we are getting is the same old tired stuff but done to the extreme. Taxing people more money has never been proven to be the way to grow an economy. Throwing more money at the NHS has never worked either. It all needs a big change. Labour doesn't have the ability to do that sadly and I doubt the Tories ever will either.
I am not a Tory.Oh yes, of course - I forgot how good the last lot were. They managed to deport 4 to Rwanda didn't they - at an enormous cost.
Thats part of the problem.80% of asylum claims are granted. They don’t get deported.
You dont have to ask them you just impose an immigration tax, like a tariff but for people.Can you ask Mexico to pay for a Wall?
An opinion which reveals a lot. Your hero, Nigel Farage, is a descendant of Huguenot refugees.Thats part of the problem.
Just 5% of this country is built up and urban.
Once the Kulaks have been forced of their land there will plenty of space for new urban communities to flourishJust 5% of this country is built up and urban.
My answer to this question is I hope so and I am optimistic.
This is my experience over the years of living in Shinfield and part of the Wokingham constituency.
Up until the last election John Redwood was my MP. I never saw him in the whole time he was my MP, I did email him a couple of times and got a response, that at best what I would say was a trite answer at worst just plain rude.
Last week I had a knock on my door and it was Yuan Yang our new Labour MP and she was asking me about what issues I felt strongly about in our constituency.
Our area over the last 17 years has been inundated with housing projects, so much so that the village is unrecognisable to the place when I moved here, and there is even more planned. Now you may say I am being a nimby to complain about this, but my argument to her was, that I understood there was a housing crises, but that the houses being built were the wrong type and that there should be more social and affordable housing, otherwise the housing crises will continue forever. My second was that the houses that had already been built by the greedy arseholes that built them, sold off the leases and maintenance contracts and the poor sods that have bought these houses were left with massive costs that they didn't sign up for and were stuck paying for, all in the name of greed, and to top it off, they were not doing the work they were being charged for.
So to compare and contrast my experience with the last Tory MP and my current Labour MP. (this is why I am hopeful)
That does not make sense. If you are looking at a statistic that 80% of asylum applications are approved, presumably the 20% that are rejected are deemed to be bogus. That is inherently in the data, unless you are implying bogus ones are somehow excluded before their applications are assessed.The bogus asylum seekers are not included in the statistics.
Hes a bit of a wet lettuce TBH. And so what?An opinion which reveals a lot. Your hero, Nigel Farage, is a descendant of Huguenot refugees.
And rightly so, these Consultant Neurosurgeons have to come from somewhere, I read it on here.80% of asylum claims are granted. They don’t get deported.
And we can't deal with the shit that produces now.Just 5% of this country is built up and urban.
It wasn't meant as a serious reply.That does not make sense. If you are looking at a statistic that 80% of asylum applications are approved, presumably the 20% that are rejected are deemed to be bogus. That is inherently in the data, unless you are implying bogus ones are somehow excluded before their applications are assessed.
We? Are you referring to the privatised water companies?And we can't deal with the shit that produces now.
We as in infrastructure, you know, the essential stuff. It doesn't seem to matter who owns it, it affects us all so we all have to deal with it.We? Are you referring to the privatised water companies?