Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[News] Middle East conflict



Insel affe

Insel affe

HellBilly
Feb 23, 2009
24,496
Brighton factually.....
Curious Orange said:
I wish people would stop using the word genocide in relation to this conflict.
Click to expand...
It is an uncomfortable word is it not, but that is what it is.
Curious Orange said:
If that was the genuine intent of Israel then Gaza would have been levelled months ago without having to commit ground troops.
Click to expand...
Nah, if Israel had done that, there would have had immediate condemnation, this way they slowly work through Palestine making sure all their targets are achieved and to hell with the collateral damage. In these days of precision warfare there is no excuse to flatten all before the might of the Israeli war machine.

All the condemnation in the world is not going to stop Israel, the west is to pre occupied with elections and appeasing there own war industries/sales, war is big business and the west profits from this ongoing war.
 
Last edited:




Curious Orange

Curious Orange

Punxsatawney Phil
Jul 5, 2003
10,257
On NSC for over two decades...
Thanks for posting that @hans kraay fan club , it is useful to the thread to see that in writing. I stand by what I said, based on that definition.

I also reiterate that I do not in any way condone what either Israel or Hamas are doing, they are all complicit in what is happening to the innocent victims of this horrific conflict. I also take a dim view of Egypt's refusal to take refugees (yes, I know 100,000 people have crossed the border, but they are not technically refugees, and someone is on a nice little earner arranging their visits).
 


J

:J)

Active member
Jul 7, 2003
660
Brighton
Curious Orange said:
Thanks for posting that @hans kraay fan club , it is useful to the thread to see that in writing. I stand by what I said, based on that definition.

I also reiterate that I do not in any way condone what either Israel or Hamas are doing, they are all complicit in what is happening to the innocent victims of this horrific conflict. I also take a dim view of Egypt's refusal to take refugees (yes, I know 100,000 people have crossed the border, but they are not technically refugees, and someone is on a nice little earner arranging their visits).
Click to expand...
Jesus wept. Since 1948 the percentage of Palestinians killed in the conflict have far outnumbered those of Israelis. This old Vox article (from 2014) states that "87 percent of deaths have been Palestinian and only 13 percent Israeli", but "the most striking thing about this chart [see article] may be how dramatically the rate of Israeli deaths has declined since the early 2000s, with many months passing with no deaths at all."

Fast forward to the present day - and the past 12 months or so. Even after Hamas' devastating attack on 7 October 2023 the ratio has only gone up - according to these charts in Statista ratio is more like 96.5% vs 3.5%). And that is assuming that the figures of deaths in Gaza/West Bank are accurate, after the Israelis have decimated state structures that help count the dead: hospitals, aid agencies, water facilities, etc - or those who report on the dead (journalists killed, Western reporters not allowed in). So The Lancet as well as other agencies have estimated that deaths could be at least 186,000 (at the time of the report, July 2024). Included in this figure are those killed through famine, lack of water, medical supplies etc - all things that Israel is actively blocking.

And like @hans kraay fan club says - "The IDF and Israeli politicians are on record, multiple times, repeating their belief that every Palestinian is complicit."

But no... it's BOTH SIDES.
 


Curious Orange

Curious Orange

Punxsatawney Phil
Jul 5, 2003
10,257
On NSC for over two decades...
:J) said:
But no... it's BOTH SIDES.
Click to expand...

Indeed, there is no justification for the violence inflicted by either side.

Actually, let me clarify that. There is no no moral justification (to me at least) for the violence inflicted by either side. Though one side has it's own idealogical justification for it's violence, and the other has what appears to be the justification of revenge as theirs.
 
Last edited:


D

dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,681
wellquickwoody said:
People keep commenting how civilians and infrastructure faired worse in earlier conflicts, and they are correct.

But since then what is acceptable has changed, or should have changed, modern warfare. The setting up of the United Nations, the creation of the Geneva Convention, Unless one side in a conflict actually is in danger of being wiped out (therefore not Israel) then the indiscriminate, repeated killing of civilians being passed off as collateral damage is no longer acceptable.
Click to expand...
It's not as easy as we might think. Yes, Israel has far better ability to hit their targets than the WW2 bombers, but on the other hand when the enemy is hiding troops in a hospital, it's hard to hit the troops but not the hospital. (It's also against the Geneva Convention to station troops in a hospital.)

Why is Hamas still fighting? Are they trying to achieve anything, apart from the death of more of their people? If they surrendered to the United Nations then they would get all the peace and aid that they need, though hopefully this time they won't use the aid on tunnels and weapons of war.
 






Westdene Seagull

Westdene Seagull

aka Cap'n Carl Firecrotch
NSC Patron
Oct 27, 2003
21,582
The arse end of Hangleton
Curious Orange said:
Why would they care? They don't seem at all bothered about anyone's opinion about the terrible things that they are doing*.



* Hamas started it by doing a terrible thing, and continue to do terrible things.
Click to expand...
Firstly the Israeli Defence Minister ( a stark raving extreme right winger ) has made it clear in his statements about the future of Gaza that he expects Palestinians to either leave Gaza or be killed as 'combatants' - that IS genocide.

Secondly, Hamas started this round BUT both sides have been responsible for the ongoing conflict over the last 80 years. Israel used terrorist tactics against the British at the beginning. Both Hamas et al and the Israeli government are terrorist organisations intent on genocide.
 


wellquickwoody

wellquickwoody

Many More Voting Years
NSC Patron
Aug 10, 2007
13,957
Melbourne
dsr-burnley said:
It's not as easy as we might think. Yes, Israel has far better ability to hit their targets than the WW2 bombers, but on the other hand when the enemy is hiding troops in a hospital, it's hard to hit the troops but not the hospital. (It's also against the Geneva Convention to station troops in a hospital.)

Why is Hamas still fighting? Are they trying to achieve anything, apart from the death of more of their people? If they surrendered to the United Nations then they would get all the peace and aid that they need, though hopefully this time they won't use the aid on tunnels and weapons of war.
Click to expand...
UN installations, refugee camps, snipers taking out children, journalists targeted, holding back aid (Yanks telling them to send it in), schools. These are known breaches of international law Over a period of more than a year.

We could then start on treatment of prisoners, West Bank ethnic cleansing, utter disregard for Lebanese sovereignty, attacks on other countries, the list is hardly a glowing report of a humanitarian and law abiding state. Yes, Israel was attacked, but over a year ago which cannot excuse what is happening now.
 




Zeberdi

Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
7,213
Curious Orange said:
Thanks for posting that @hans kraay fan club , it is useful to the thread to see that in writing. I stand by what I said, based on that definition.

I also reiterate that I do not in any way condone what either Israel or Hamas are doing, they are all complicit in what is happening to the innocent victims of this horrific conflict. I also take a dim view of Egypt's refusal to take refugees (yes, I know 100,000 people have crossed the border, but they are not technically refugees, and someone is on a nice little earner arranging their visits).
Click to expand...

The definition of Genocide has been posted a few times on this thread but it is important to say that ‘genocide’ as a legal definition is difficult and complex to establish legally and the definition in the Genocide Convention requires that ‘intent’ is present. Netanyahu is currently facing an application by the prosecutor at the ICJ to charge him as a war criminal and Israel is facing a case of genocide at the ICJ.

www.aa.com.tr

1 year of Gaza genocide: Will Netanyahu soon be an accused war criminal?

Legal action at the ICJ and ICC are an ‘unprecedented breach of Israel’s decades-long impunity,’ says veteran war crimes prosecutor Reed Brody - Anadolu Ajansı
www.aa.com.tr www.aa.com.tr


Israel could claim that they are not ‘intentionally’ trying to destroy the Palestinian people - in fact they have claimed that repeatedly - in actions too - by banning UNWRA on one hand and saying aid must continue on another, is exactly that. So is bombing residential buildings and destroying hospitals but saying they are targeting the terrorists using them.

Unfortunately cases take years to go through the International Court and then there is a lack of enforcement mechanisms for convictions under international law - by the time it comes to Israel actually facing punishment, it will be too late for the Palestinian people if genocide really is the objective.


As for Egypt’s refusal to take refugees - Egypt’s refusal is because Egypt is a Muslim Country that will not support the forceable removal of Palestinians under the pretext of ‘refugee flights’ when there is no right of return in place. Palestinians do not want to leave Gaza if they have no means of returning. I am totally on board with that. If Palestinians started to be removed from Gaza with no guaranteed right to return in place, how long would it be before Jewish settlement programmes began again in that small strip of land?
 


Zeberdi

Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
7,213
Curious Orange said:
Okay, I suppose you could argue that Israel are aiming to commit genocide of the group called Hamas, but people on this thread aren't being that specific.
Click to expand...

No you could not.

I’ll be specific for you.

Hamas are not a distinct, national, ethnic, racial or religious group they are a terrorist organisation. They are a highly radicalised Palestinian armed guerrilla group and political movement that is rooted in Jihadist fundamentalist Islamic ideology. The definition of ‘genocide’ does not stretch to a just such group in a society that is otherwise indistinguishable from the rest of that society on the grounds of ethnicity, nationality, race etc

The whole Palestinian people on the other hand living in Gaza and the rest of the occupied territories, ie the civilians and Hamas (around 5m) are a nation of people with a distinct ethnic and national identity and are primarily sunni muslim.

Palestinians as a ’people’ certainly can in principle be the victims of genocide and the International Court is currently considering whether that is in fact unfolding.
 


A1X

A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,799
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Sea Cider said:
Not saying it isn't happening, but seems like a nice easy justification for destruction of any hospital, bank, civilian structures, women, children etc

"There were terrorists hiding behind them"
Click to expand...
The press: “Oh OK, can we see the evidence of the terrorists being there?”

The IDF: “No.”
 




H

Hastings gull

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2013
4,653
A1X said:
The press: “Oh OK, can we see the evidence of the terrorists being there?”

The IDF: “No.”
Click to expand...
A1X said:
The press: “Oh OK, can we see the evidence of the terrorists being there?”

The IDF: “No.”
Click to expand...
But how would you get evidence of them being there? With Israeli raids on their hideouts, I am sure that they would not want the world to see that they had indeed used schools etc to hide in, and use as weapon dumps, as Israel claims. That would totally destroy their credibility.
 


J

:J)

Active member
Jul 7, 2003
660
Brighton
Hastings gull said:
But how would you get evidence of them being there? With Israeli raids on their hideouts, I am sure that they would not want the world to see that they had indeed used schools etc to hide in, and use as weapon dumps, as Israel claims. That would totally destroy their credibility.
Click to expand...
Why does the State of Israel 'hide' the IDF headquarters right slap bang in the middle of densely populated Tel Aviv?
 






Westdene Seagull

Westdene Seagull

aka Cap'n Carl Firecrotch
NSC Patron
Oct 27, 2003
21,582
The arse end of Hangleton
Hastings gull said:
But how would you get evidence of them being there? With Israeli raids on their hideouts, I am sure that they would not want the world to see that they had indeed used schools etc to hide in, and use as weapon dumps, as Israel claims. That would totally destroy their credibility.
Click to expand...
But conversely, what about the IDFs claim about a hospital in Beirut Hezbollah use for stashing gold and cash? The BBC got unrestricted access to said hospital and searched for said stash - nothing. When the IDF saw the report they claimed the BBC searched in the wrong place. So the BBC searched a second time using IDF info - still nothing. Clearly an IDF lie. They get caught out in Lebanon because the press have access to expose the IDF lies. I wonder why they won't give access to the worlds press to Gaza ?
 




Zeberdi

Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
7,213
Netanyahu has sacked his Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant ‘quietly’ while the world is focused on the US election.

Gallant has been an outspoken critic of Netanyahu’s judicial reforms in the past and now over the war in Gaza and Netanyahu’s refusal to negotiate a hostage release. He has questioned Netanyahu’s management of the war and called for a domestic inquiry into the security lapses that resulted in the 7/10 massacre.

Gallant is replaced by Israel Katz, who had been foreign minister, and who has been a staunch advocate of Israel’s right-wing government. Katz is a member of Netanyahu’s far right Lukid party and supports the settlement expansion.

This is a big heads up to where Israel is now vis a vis breaking away with international opinion on Gaza and the hardline agenda that Netanyahu is continuing to pursue

www.theguardian.com

Protests in Israel after defence minister sacked – as it happened

This blog is now closed
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
 
  • Sad
Reactions: :J)


B

borat

Well-known member
Jul 16, 2003
661
Zeberdi said:
Netanyahu has sacked his Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant ‘quietly’ while the world is focused on the US election.

Gallant has been an outspoken critic of Netanyahu’s judicial reforms in the past and now over the war in Gaza and Netanyahu’s refusal to negotiate a hostage release. He has questioned Netanyahu’s management of the war and called for a domestic inquiry into the security lapses that resulted in the 7/10 massacre.

Gallant is replaced by Israel Katz, who had been foreign minister, and who has been a staunch advocate of Israel’s right-wing government. Katz is a member of Netanyahu’s far right Lukid party and supports the settlement expansion.

This is a big heads up to where Israel is now vis a vis breaking away with international opinion on Gaza and the hardline agenda that Netanyahu is continuing to pursue

www.theguardian.com

Protests in Israel after defence minister sacked – as it happened

This blog is now closed
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...

The Israeli parliament is full of genocidal maniacs.



www.theguardian.com

No power, water or fuel to Gaza until hostages freed, says Israel minister

US secretary of state lands in Tel Aviv after fifth night of bombardment and preparations for ground invasion
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
 








You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top
Link Here