Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[News] British monarchy “making millions from taxpayers”



Pavilionaire

Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
31,256
Westdene Seagull said:
Not sure what the issue is. The Duchies are privately owned 'businesses', admittedly they don't pay corporation tax at 25% but William and Charles do pay income tax on the income they receive .... at 45%. If government departments need to rent buildings what is the difference between paying rent to the Duchies and a private corporation probably with foreign shareholders ?

Additionally, both Duchies provide housing to many and farm tenancies - something you wouldn't get from large shareholder owned corporations.

I can think of a lot of other things to get all angry over.
Click to expand...
At the very least, the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall should pay Corporation Tax to HMRC on the profits they make. These are private businesses owned by Charles and William, from which they derive private wealth. While Charles and William are not bound by law to pay income tax it is morally wrong that they can pick and choose how they wish to be taxed.

Furthermore, is it still right that Charles and William should own vast stretches of land and coastline, so derive vast amounts of passive income in the form of rents?

Clearly, much of the profits are ploughed back into community and charitable causes but - again - does that make it right that they - rather than the people of the UK - are receiving the money in the first place?
 




Super Steve Earle

Super Steve Earle

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2009
8,910
North of Brighton
Is this the Despatches programme where the Royals own the land but water companies own the properties and derive the income?- yawn...
 


Clive Walker

Clive Walker

Stand Or Fall
Jul 5, 2011
3,588
Brighton
Super Steve Earle said:
Is this the Despatches programme where the Royals own the land but water companies own the properties and derive the income?- yawn...
Click to expand...
It’s the dispatches programme where plebs fund the nhs through tax and donations while the RF rinses them in rent.

Utterly undefendable.
 


highflyer

highflyer

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2016
2,547
I assume that if we were to abolish the monarchy, these estates could be returned to government ownership? Thus saving the taxpayer many (many) millions? Strange if so as all the 'economic analysis' I keep getting told about insists that the RF makes us money? I guess you have to set the income from the estates, and savings on rental, against all those American tourists that would not burn tons of carbon to come and visit the royals in person...
 






H

Half Time Pies

Well-known member
Sep 7, 2003
1,572
Brighton
beorhthelm said:
would you as a contracts manager take on or be encouraged to take on a contract because its from the Duchy, rather than another supplier?

there are questions over transparency for the Duchies, however seems there's a bigger issue of transparency from the buyers if there are suggestions they buy services because its the Duchy.
Click to expand...
I left the NHS in 2011, so its a long time since I worked there and I was on relatively low value contracts of less than a million, but my perception of NHS property services and estates based on the trusts I worked for was that it was a complete disaster! The procedures followed under EU rules for public procurement were very complex and onerous but the estates and property department was extremely under-resourced and under a lot of time pressure so they were regularly cutting corners. I remember a senior property manager telling me about a PFI scheme he was managing where he would turn up to the meetings with himself as the sole representative of the trust and the PFI project company would have a team of various specialists and lawyers ensuring that they could squeeze as much money out of the trust as possible! The same manager also told me that on one project at year end they couldn't account for £1 million, they had absolutely no idea where it went! It wouldn't have surprised me if there was an element of cronyism and corruption, with deals done behind the scenes, and I was glad to get out of there.
 


H

Half Time Pies

Well-known member
Sep 7, 2003
1,572
Brighton
Mo Gosfield said:
.....and the likes of Trump are the reason why they continue to wave the flag.
The thought of President Blair or Johnson is too ghastly to even contemplate.....President Truss.....!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Many countries have an elected head of state that is not involved in making political decisions or running the government, so there would be no need for Britain to adopt a US style presidential system and for us to end up with President Truss!
 








DJ NOBO

DJ NOBO

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2004
6,809
Wiltshire
Westdene Seagull said:
Not sure what the issue is. The Duchies are privately owned 'businesses', admittedly they don't pay corporation tax at 25% but William and Charles do pay income tax on the income they receive .... at 45%. If government departments need to rent buildings what is the difference between paying rent to the Duchies and a private corporation probably with foreign shareholders ?

Additionally, both Duchies provide housing to many and farm tenancies - something you wouldn't get from large shareholder owned corporations.

I can think of a lot of other things to get all angry over.
Click to expand...
I can help you with this. They are exploiting laws established in medieval times to make tens of millions of pounds a year from tax payer-funded institutions like the NHS.
It’s fair enough if this doesn’t square with some people’s moral compass, don‘t you think?
 


H

Hiheidi

Well-known member
Dec 27, 2022
1,881
DJ NOBO said:
I can help you with this. They are exploiting laws established in medieval times to make tens of millions of pounds a year from tax payer-funded institutions like the NHS.
Click to expand...

So, one of the headline stats is that an NHS trust is being charged £11 m to store their ambulances on his land for 15 years. I totally agree it's not a good look for the Monarch but if the NHS could find anywhere cheaper surely they would have done so (unless they are completely incompetent), in which case it must represent market value.
 




DJ NOBO

DJ NOBO

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2004
6,809
Wiltshire
Hiheidi said:
So, one of the headline stats is that an NHS trust is being charged £11 m to store their ambulances on his land for 15 years. I totally agree it's not a good look for the Monarch but if the NHS could find anywhere cheaper surely they would have done so (unless they are completely incompetent), in which case it must represent market value.
Click to expand...
From a business perspective it makes a lot of sense. Legally, it is sound. Good luck to them, you could argue.
But some of the institutions that have deals with the royals are tax-payer funded, some also receive donations from the likes of you and I.
It is all kinds of wrong that a share of that money helps fund the royal family, due to laws created when society was so different.( And I’m not particularly anti royal).
 


AmexRuislip

AmexRuislip

Retired Spy 🕵️‍♂️
Feb 2, 2014
34,704
Ruislip
Let's face it, these bunch of royal clowns are literally laughing all the way to the bank.
All this wealth is absurd, down right greedy and embarrassing.
The NHS aside which is progressively always on its knees, there's poverty in our country.
The monies that are generated through the Duchy's 'checking account' really need to be diverted to aide the latter.
All of IMO
 
Last edited:


A

abc

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2007
1,371
DJ NOBO said:
I can help you with this. They are exploiting laws established in medieval times to make tens of millions of pounds a year from tax payer-funded institutions like the NHS.
It’s fair enough if this doesn’t square with some people’s moral compass, don‘t you think?
Click to expand...

I had no idea that the nhs existed in medieval times. Or were they just really forward thinking? 🤦
 








H

Hiheidi

Well-known member
Dec 27, 2022
1,881
abc said:
Suggest adding the c of e to this thread. Assets of c£10 billion, one of the largest landowners in the Uk who ruthlessly evict their tenant farmers in order to sell land for development, and yet pay ZERO tax.

Monarchy postively benign in contrast
Click to expand...

Went to a CofE church for a bit when my kids were young. Gone are the days when you'd throw a few coins in the collection after the service - they asked for a direct debit and said what you gave had to be felt by you to be a proper donation. The vicar would chase you down if you didn't have a monthly payment set up. Now my kids are happy atheists!
 


Lyndhurst 14

Lyndhurst 14

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2008
5,239
Half Time Pies said:
Many countries have an elected head of state that is not involved in making political decisions or running the government, so there would be no need for Britain to adopt a US style presidential system and for us to end up with President Truss!
Click to expand...
Exactly, and I prefer to be a citizen and not a subject
 




zefarelly

zefarelly

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
22,769
Sussex, by the sea
Ahh the establishment.

Doesn't matter what hat they wear, they're all dry humping us. religion must be the worst, scaring people out of their hard earnt while they do it all tax free. An incredible business model.

If any one 'working' group does get ahead they get a pat on a head and then beaten down before too long.

I've seen new money sucking up to auld money at events . . . They think they're in., but they're not . . . And their wealth is usually temporary . . . .

inherited peerages can't stop soon enough.

and relax . . .blimey, it's only Monday 😂
 


stewart12

stewart12

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2019
1,916
Mo Gosfield said:
.....and the likes of Trump are the reason why they continue to wave the flag.
The thought of President Blair or Johnson is too ghastly to even contemplate.....President Truss.....!!!!!!
Click to expand...
In the grand scheme of things what is the actual difference between President Truss and Prime Minister Truss
 


You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top
Link Here