Literally reading back the headline on the SSN ticker.
Anyone know a football finance DULLARD who could shed some light on this?
Care to explain why?
Perhaps a little more attention to detail then and more people might not just think you're just attention seeking like most of your threads.
The court ruled that APT rules should extend to interest-free loans made by club owners, which could mean us being charged commercial rates, with all the accompanying consequences for our PSR standing.
Pasted from BBC
If anything City appear to have succeeded in getting the court to force the PL to crack down on shareholder loans.
Is it that we would actually be charged at commercial rates, or PSR calculations would assume commercial rates?
See post #10
Better Ask a Dullard™
Imagine looking at your 'colleagues' in this being Everton, City, Chelsea and Newcastle. Blimey.
Surely old loans must be grandfathered? And I don't think more loans in the near future is the plan anyway - the TB&PB has said the club want to be self-financing and this may well be the case now given the value of this gigantic squad. Or am I missing something?
