Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] The Labour Government



Pondicherry

Well-known member
May 25, 2007
1,085
Horsham
Sausages.PNG
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,799
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Known troublemaker causes trouble

Film at 11
 




Bry Nylon

Test your smoke alarm
Helpful Moderator
Jul 21, 2003
20,660
Playing snooker
Known troublemaker causes trouble
I'd agree to an extent and that is certainly "the line" that Morgan McSweeny will be sending out for Labour MPs to use. In fairness, there really isn't much else they can say.

The problem is, there is so much in it and so much that has just enough of an element of truth to it. Not just the accepting of gifts and 'cruel' policies that don't directly impact on anybody in the House etc; but more the stuff about his rapid rise, perceived lack of political skills and a sense that this isn't an isolated view among the PLP. This is all new stuff for the media to latch onto and has the potential to be very damaging. Dangerous for the Leadership if they just try to dismiss it as the ramblings of a disaffected trouble-maker, in my view.
 






dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,683
The real story ?? "pensioners freezing to death in their homes". can you show me any story this Autumn(not even cold yet) where any pensioner has frozen to death in their home ??
The point about pensioners freezing to death, is that the Labour party published a report in 2017 stating that the withdrawal of the winter fuel allowance had saved approx 3,850 lives per year on average for the previous 20 years, and withdrawal of that allowance would kill 3,850 per year in future. It even mentions the detail about pensioners just over the pension credit limit.

I am not aware that they have withdrawn that opinion and denounced it as a load of rubbish. Which means that it still stands as official Labour viewpoint and that they have withdrawn the allowance in full expectation that they will kill 3,850 pensioners (approx) by doing so.

Which means that we don't need to argue about how many people will die - the government has given us their official estimate of 3,850. All we need worry about now is whether the government is right to allow those people to die in order to save their £1.4 billion.



 


dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,683
This whole "giftgate" issue with Starmer started because he misdeclared Alli's gifts to his wife. He didn't know he had to declare them so he got his form wrong and had to correct it. The stuff about the clothes he had received personally was already in the public domain but no-one had bothered. He opened the whole can of worms himself.

The Arsenal tickets ought to be a non-event. It's perfectly reasonable IMO for the PM to sit in the director's box. Burnley's MP (Peter Pike) I believe had his own season ticket before, during and after his term as MP, but if he did have a director's box ticket then it bothered no-one. Blackburn's MP (and for that matter Blackburn's bishop) had seats in the main stand with their name on it, long ago in the pre-Jack Walker days. Whether they still do, I neither know nor care. It's trivial.

The vastly expensive clothes, especially to his wife, are dodgy.

But even more dodgy is that living accommodation. Firstly, the idea of sitting in someone else's house telling people they should work from home, is hypocritical at best. One quote from his speech was "Let’s pull together now and do the right thing once more. At times like this, we must all put the national interest first and play by the rules. Of course, I understand that sticking to the rules can be inconvenient, but stick to the rules we must.” To say that with a straight face while not working from home is dishonest, and frankly I don't see it as less reprehensible than what Johnson and Cummings did.

And now he says he moved into Alli's flat for 45 nights because he wanted his son to have peace and quiet for GSCE revision. This is a lie. He moved in on 29th May, GCSEs finished on June 19th, he left on July 13th. He was there for at least 24 days after his son's last exam. Whatever his reasons may have been for the first 21 nights, his reason for the rest is a lie. And a stupid lie, because it's so easily caught.

This is another quote from Starmer. "The Seven Principles of Public Life, external, as they are also known, are selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and leadership. That is the standards I expect of them [government ministers]. As I’ve said throughout, people falling short of the required standards will face consequences, as you would expect.” Does he stand by that? How many of the seven principles, if any, has he achieved?

 


jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
15,019
T
The point about pensioners freezing to death, is that the Labour party published a report in 2017 stating that the withdrawal of the winter fuel allowance had saved approx 3,850 lives per year on average for the previous 20 years, and withdrawal of that allowance would kill 3,850 per year in future. It even mentions the detail about pensioners just over the pension credit limit.

I am not aware that they have withdrawn that opinion and denounced it as a load of rubbish. Which means that it still stands as official Labour viewpoint and that they have withdrawn the allowance in full expectation that they will kill 3,850 pensioners (approx) by doing so.

Which means that we don't need to argue about how many people will die - the government has given us their official estimate of 3,850. All we need worry about now is whether the government is right to allow those people to die in order to save their £1.4 billion.



The problem is they know all this, but no amount of persuasion will ever change a lifelong supporter of a political party to another - or in extreme cases as we’ve seen - to countenance valid criticisms of their “baby”. The same thing on all sides, whether you’re red, green or blue.

There is a real case of indoctrination (look at Trump supporters in the US for an extreme example) in all aspects of UK politics.

Right now, the Labour hardcore even on here can’t quite believe what’s happened, so deflect, defend, obfuscate.

This has been one of the worst starts to an incoming government in British political history.
 




sydney

tinky ****in winky
Jul 11, 2003
17,974
town full of eejits
This whole "giftgate" issue with Starmer started because he misdeclared Alli's gifts to his wife. He didn't know he had to declare them so he got his form wrong and had to correct it. The stuff about the clothes he had received personally was already in the public domain but no-one had bothered. He opened the whole can of worms himself.

The Arsenal tickets ought to be a non-event. It's perfectly reasonable IMO for the PM to sit in the director's box. Burnley's MP (Peter Pike) I believe had his own season ticket before, during and after his term as MP, but if he did have a director's box ticket then it bothered no-one. Blackburn's MP (and for that matter Blackburn's bishop) had seats in the main stand with their name on it, long ago in the pre-Jack Walker days. Whether they still do, I neither know nor care. It's trivial.

The vastly expensive clothes, especially to his wife, are dodgy.

But even more dodgy is that living accommodation. Firstly, the idea of sitting in someone else's house telling people they should work from home, is hypocritical at best. One quote from his speech was "Let’s pull together now and do the right thing once more. At times like this, we must all put the national interest first and play by the rules. Of course, I understand that sticking to the rules can be inconvenient, but stick to the rules we must.” To say that with a straight face while not working from home is dishonest, and frankly I don't see it as less reprehensible than what Johnson and Cummings did.

And now he says he moved into Alli's flat for 45 nights because he wanted his son to have peace and quiet for GSCE revision. This is a lie. He moved in on 29th May, GCSEs finished on June 19th, he left on July 13th. He was there for at least 24 days after his son's last exam. Whatever his reasons may have been for the first 21 nights, his reason for the rest is a lie. And a stupid lie, because it's so easily caught.

This is another quote from Starmer. "The Seven Principles of Public Life, external, as they are also known, are selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and leadership. That is the standards I expect of them [government ministers]. As I’ve said throughout, people falling short of the required standards will face consequences, as you would expect.” Does he stand by that? How many of the seven principles, if any, has he achieved?

i take it you're not a fan then...:lolol: i just think that targeting people who have largely worked and paid taxes for years by removing their heating allowance is reprehensible , disgusting policy.
 


sydney

tinky ****in winky
Jul 11, 2003
17,974
town full of eejits
T

The problem is they know all this, but no amount of persuasion will ever change a lifelong supporter of a political party to another - or in extreme cases as we’ve seen - to countenance valid criticisms of their “baby”. The same thing on all sides, whether you’re red, green or blue.

There is a real case of indoctrination (look at Trump supporters in the US for an extreme example) in all aspects of UK politics.

Right now, the Labour hardcore even on here can’t quite believe what’s happened, so deflect, defend, obfuscate.

This has been one of the worst starts to an incoming government in British political history.
i know plenty of Labour supporters who have turned due to this idiot.
 


highflyer

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2016
2,572
Live by the sword, die by the sword, I'm afraid. The labour right has spent the last 9 years focussing on personal attacks on those they oppose (within and beyond their own party), as opposed to developing a clear, inspiring vision for how to move the country forward. Now they can't be too surprised that, in an ongoing policy vacuum (well, apart from 'more austerity and be nice to the rich' tbf), the same kind of attacks are aimed at them. Especially when they provide such easy targets.
 






armchairclubber

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2010
1,659
Bexhill
I found this part of Rosie Duffield letter most revealing.

You also made the choice not to speak up once about the Labour Party's problems with antisemitism during your time in the shadow cabinet, leaving that to backbenchers, including new MPs such as me.

Since you took office as Leader of the Opposition you have used various heavy-handed management tactics but have never shown what most experienced backbenchers would recognise as true or inspiring leadership.

You have never regularly engaged with your own backbench MPs, many of whom have been in Parliament far longer than you, and some of whom served in the previous Labour government.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Labour, was quite rightly trying to rid itself of any antisemitism.

But the likes of Keir Starmer and ''Zionist Shitlord' Luke Akehurst were doing their best to undermine this. Both Zionists who are not Jewish. And one now found a safe seat.

All while Labour was becoming more influenced by and taking donations from Israel lobby etc.

Antisemitism is perhaps 'in the eye of the beholder' to an extent, though I'd suggest Labour has an even greater problem now thanks to slippery Starmer and his disciples.
 


nevergoagain

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2005
1,601
nowhere near Burgess Hill
Rosie Duffield is a strange one. To resign so soon after a general election where your party has absolutely nailed it suggests that she's probably not the sort you really want in your party anyway.
 




Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
58,809
hassocks
This whole "giftgate" issue with Starmer started because he misdeclared Alli's gifts to his wife. He didn't know he had to declare them so he got his form wrong and had to correct it. The stuff about the clothes he had received personally was already in the public domain but no-one had bothered. He opened the whole can of worms himself.

The Arsenal tickets ought to be a non-event. It's perfectly reasonable IMO for the PM to sit in the director's box. Burnley's MP (Peter Pike) I believe had his own season ticket before, during and after his term as MP, but if he did have a director's box ticket then it bothered no-one. Blackburn's MP (and for that matter Blackburn's bishop) had seats in the main stand with their name on it, long ago in the pre-Jack Walker days. Whether they still do, I neither know nor care. It's trivial.

The vastly expensive clothes, especially to his wife, are dodgy.

But even more dodgy is that living accommodation. Firstly, the idea of sitting in someone else's house telling people they should work from home, is hypocritical at best. One quote from his speech was "Let’s pull together now and do the right thing once more. At times like this, we must all put the national interest first and play by the rules. Of course, I understand that sticking to the rules can be inconvenient, but stick to the rules we must.” To say that with a straight face while not working from home is dishonest, and frankly I don't see it as less reprehensible than what Johnson and Cummings did.

And now he says he moved into Alli's flat for 45 nights because he wanted his son to have peace and quiet for GSCE revision. This is a lie. He moved in on 29th May, GCSEs finished on June 19th, he left on July 13th. He was there for at least 24 days after his son's last exam. Whatever his reasons may have been for the first 21 nights, his reason for the rest is a lie. And a stupid lie, because it's so easily caught.

This is another quote from Starmer. "The Seven Principles of Public Life, external, as they are also known, are selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and leadership. That is the standards I expect of them [government ministers]. As I’ve said throughout, people falling short of the required standards will face consequences, as you would expect.” Does he stand by that? How many of the seven principles, if any, has he achieved?

Let's not forget at this point Starmer wanted the country in a full lockdown as well
 


armchairclubber

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2010
1,659
Bexhill
Rosie Duffield is a strange one. To resign so soon after a general election where your party has absolutely nailed it suggests that she's probably not the sort you really want in your party anyway.

She is no doubt now going to face counter attacks from the Labour hierarchy (still waiting on their response) as well as others who wish to highlight other stances she has made.
 


sydney

tinky ****in winky
Jul 11, 2003
17,974
town full of eejits
I found this part of Rosie Duffield letter most revealing.

You also made the choice not to speak up once about the Labour Party's problems with antisemitism during your time in the shadow cabinet, leaving that to backbenchers, including new MPs such as me.

Since you took office as Leader of the Opposition you have used various heavy-handed management tactics but have never shown what most experienced backbenchers would recognise as true or inspiring leadership.

You have never regularly engaged with your own backbench MPs, many of whom have been in Parliament far longer than you, and some of whom served in the previous Labour government.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Labour, was quite rightly trying to rid itself of any antisemitism.

But the likes of Keir Starmer and ''Zionist Shitlord' Luke Akehurst were doing their best to undermine this. Both Zionists who are not Jewish. And one now found a safe seat.

All while Labour was becoming more influenced by and taking donations from Israel lobby etc.

Antisemitism is perhaps 'in the eye of the beholder' to an extent, though I'd suggest Labour has an even greater problem now thanks to slippery Starmer and his disciples.
antisemitism is a very strange thing to define isn't it , particularly in the current climate.
 










Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here