Mrs Bodian received a £1.25 refund quite recently. And she didn't even know she was entitled to it.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Would YOU be happy to pay more income tax so OAPs could keep their fuel payments?
- Thread starter Guinness Boy
- Start date
Agree, but there is a paradox - the more pensioners who apply for/receive Pension Credits (and related or 'passported' benefits), the more it wipes out the savings Reeves intended to make from reducing WFA!
I never really like these questions because it always makes the assumption that in raising tax, the extra money gathered actually does go to the purpose of paying for these things.
I don’t, in theory, mind raising tax’s for meeting various societal needs however in the past government, a very large amount of our taxes were essentially embezzled away to various friends of Tories in the form of dodgy contracts etc. PPE scandal for example, but there is plenty more.
When my money is going to the already wealthy friends of the government and not into the public services or goods such as a winter fuel payment, then I mind my taxes being raised very much. If Labour are more honest and collect the extra taxes and use it to help pensioners, then I don’t mind at all.
I don’t, in theory, mind raising tax’s for meeting various societal needs however in the past government, a very large amount of our taxes were essentially embezzled away to various friends of Tories in the form of dodgy contracts etc. PPE scandal for example, but there is plenty more.
When my money is going to the already wealthy friends of the government and not into the public services or goods such as a winter fuel payment, then I mind my taxes being raised very much. If Labour are more honest and collect the extra taxes and use it to help pensioners, then I don’t mind at all.
Shropshire Seagull
Well-known member
Don't be so sure ...
It would not be too difficult to combine the Electorol Roll register, where household cohabitation data is held with the HMRC CESA and DCDM systems. OSA won't allow me to elaborate but HMRC definitely have the data to be able to generate a household income figure using PAYE and SA data and DCDM would get pretty close to getting an individual's asset wealth worth.
I'm personally not aware that such a system already exists (above my security clearance) but to say "no database" exists may not be entirely correct.
I was often taken aback by the level of data capture / data matching that HMRC do to be aware of our individual financial circumstances.
Baldseagull
Well-known member
I would be happy for my taxes to increase, but not to give it to those that don't need it.
Wknter fuel allowance should remain for those on pension credits, be available at maybe a lower rate for every other pensioner not in highest tax band, if they apply for it, not means tested, but not just dished out to everyone either.
Wknter fuel allowance should remain for those on pension credits, be available at maybe a lower rate for every other pensioner not in highest tax band, if they apply for it, not means tested, but not just dished out to everyone either.
May wipe out the savings, but should end up with the monies previously going to those who didn't need it all going to those that do.
Perhaps a compromise, to save money and to appease some of the backlash, would be to limit the universal (as opposed to those on pension credit) to an older age group - the older people get, the more heating they generally need, so perhaps make it universal for, say, the over 85s?
It wasn’t anything complex or contentious. My self assessment was incorrect to the tune of £745. My accountant re-submitted my self-assessment and we waited. I called after a while, they claimed they hadn’t received it, my accountant had a code or something he stated as evidence of the re-submission, they said they’d look for it, I kept calling, I kept explaining to a different person every time and kept being told they’d investigate and I’d get a call-back etc etc. Eventually we were asked to re-submit again and after another few months I got the money back plus 50 extra for the inconvenience. Whole thing took 18 months.
Mustafa II
Well-known member
Wealthy pensioners should obviously not receive any kind of welfare support like this.
The poorest and most vulnerable - yes, they may need such support to survive.
In the same vain, more needs to be done to redistribute the wealth from the wealthy pensioners, in the form of higher taxes or further removal of any other benefits they may receive.
The poorest and most vulnerable - yes, they may need such support to survive.
In the same vain, more needs to be done to redistribute the wealth from the wealthy pensioners, in the form of higher taxes or further removal of any other benefits they may receive.
Official Old Man
Uckfield Seagull
I'm 68 but in all honesty don't need the WFA. I still pay tax and I'm very miffed that I pay tax on my pension.
But on the other hand, my Mum is 90 and could really do with the WFA. But she gets pension credit and so gets the extra as well.
If you think it's bad now, wait until the Autumn Budget.
But on the other hand, my Mum is 90 and could really do with the WFA. But she gets pension credit and so gets the extra as well.
If you think it's bad now, wait until the Autumn Budget.
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Not all pensioners will receive £460 as I understand it .....doesn't that only apply on the state pension as of 2016....
...then your point as to the £460 ...so net £160....... so increase in energy bills....potentially rent ...council tax etc...hmmm
Although the WFP is not £300 for most. Only >80s (3 million) got £300, under 80s (8 million) got £200.
It’s crap they don’t cooperate. Whilst I agree with the principle of means testing, it’s also crap that in 2024 there isn’t a relatively simple way to administer it.
Wardy's twin
Well-known member
- Oct 21, 2014
- 8,793
early? that's the middle of the night you are writing that
fly high
Well-known member
According to HMRC in a report published in June this year, a 1% change in base rate would raise £6.2b in 25/26, add another 1% to upper band would raise £1.35b so actually raising the higher rate would be enough especially if you added the WFP to higher rate payers income & taxed it at 40%.
Wardy's twin
Well-known member
- Oct 21, 2014
- 8,793
it always astonishes me how badly integrated government computer systems are, wouldn't (shouldn't) take a lot to extract tax paid amount and then apply it to the system which pays the winter fuel.OP’s question does state ‘every band’ tbf but this is a large part of the WF allowance problem - the admin costs of means-testing if you start to put layers onto what has been blunt instrument.…….maybe there’s a simple (ish) way to pay it to, say, pensioners that don’t pay tax for exampleVast majority of my mates/family that are of state pension age have no need for the allowance and shouldn’t get it.
Think @GB was perhaps suggesting the 2% to plug the 22bn black hole not just cover the WFA
Wardy's twin
Well-known member
- Oct 21, 2014
- 8,793
Pretty sure it was child allowance where if you as single earner in family earnt £50.1 k your family didn't get it but if both of you worked and earnt £49.9k each you got it.
Banks and FIs produce automated interest reports for HMRC too…….
….and authomatically change your tax code to collect any tax due on the interest it seems. Presume they allocate 50% on joint accounts??