By deal I meant whatever was decided but get the wording looked like transfer. My assumption is a tribunal could determine x% of sale or just of profit.It wasn't a deal, it was a tribunal ruling.
So, no deal, no sell on clause? We just get the £7M (compensation?) that Chelsea have been ordered to pay. C'est la vie!It wasn't a deal, it was a tribunal ruling.
Yes, sir!Read the link in the opening post, it defines what the tribunal ruled.
Unlikely, he was at Peterborough last season and didn’t do particularly well.Oh, he was a left back. Not sure how I had that tangled up.
Point still stands! Full back depth was desperately needed last season, he'd probably have got a go.