Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... šŸ˜Š

[Politics] The Labour Government









beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,015
Which reminds me,



When you claimed that means testing the state pension 'had been floated' by the Government a couple of days ago, I asked for your source for this and still haven't had an answer. Maybe you missed it ???
i ignored it. made no reference to government, it's just a something that columnists, analysts, whatever, raise from time to time. let it be.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,767
i ignored it. made no reference to government, it's just a something that columnists, analysts, whatever, raise from time to time. let it be.

But here, on the Labour Government thread, you said that means tested state pension 'had been floated' and added 'rather courageous politically'. Since columnists, analysts and 'whatever' aren't known for their 'political courage' who did you want people to think you were referring to ?

it has been floated. rather courageous politically, breaks the whole structure of NI. more obvious and fairer approach will be reducing the considerable tax relief for higher tax rate payers. still be able to save and get a decent pension, just without the full 40-45% bump from the treasury.

Or was it just :shit:
 
Last edited:


The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
26,183
West is BEST
The finest example of pearl clutching we have seen from the Mail in some timeā€¦


IMG_2278.jpeg
 






dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,625
I had always assumed tobacco tax pays far more than it costs the NHS but a quick google suggests it's the other way round. It's still a bit, well, long-term as a plan though. I mean nothing wrong with that while the sun is shining, but it's not - 14 years of incompetence and corruption has seen to that.
I don't know how much the average smoker costs the NHS in treatment, but I doubt it's Ā£100k. The average lifelong smoker lives 10 years less than the non-smoker, which means 10 years less pension - that's Ā£100k based on the average payment per pensioner.

There are plenty of reasons for wanting people to live longer and more healthily, but it won't save the government money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cjd


wellquickwoody

Many More Voting Years
NSC Patron
Aug 10, 2007
13,911
Melbourne
I don't know how much the average smoker costs the NHS in treatment, but I doubt it's Ā£100k. The average lifelong smoker lives 10 years less than the non-smoker, which means 10 years less pension - that's Ā£100k based on the average payment per pensioner.

There are plenty of reasons for wanting people to live longer and more healthily, but it won't save the government money.
Have to agree. Absolute balderdash to claim this is about saving money.

Every one of those people will still die, but probably much later having used far more NHS resources than if they had died 10 or 15 years earlier. The government will have also lost income from tobacco tax and VAT on sales, and business tax on profits generated from retailers, wholesalers and manufacturers. Yes I have researched figures from independent sources but I have excluded that published by anti smoking group ASH as they have their own agenda.

We can all agree that stopping young people smoking can only be a good thing, and that smoking should remain banned in indoor public places. The new tobacco laws coming into effect regarding the legal age of purchase should achieve these goals and more given time. But a ban on outdoor smoking just smacks of Mr Starmer once again deciding that he knows best without listening to any evidence. As a Tory who recognises the shit show that the Conservatives became over the last 14 years I actually want this government to improve things for the people of the UK. This does very little in that sense and smacks of political dogma and correctness just like some of the ridiculous over reaction post Southport.
 






Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,686
The Fatherland
Have to agree. Absolute balderdash to claim this is about saving money.

Every one of those people will still die, but probably much later having used far more NHS resources than if they had died 10 or 15 years earlier. The government will have also lost income from tobacco tax and VAT on sales, and business tax on profits generated from retailers, wholesalers and manufacturers. Yes I have researched figures from independent sources but I have excluded that published by anti smoking group ASH as they have their own agenda.

We can all agree that stopping young people smoking can only be a good thing, and that smoking should remain banned in indoor public places. The new tobacco laws coming into effect regarding the legal age of purchase should achieve these goals and more given time. But a ban on outdoor smoking just smacks of Mr Starmer once again deciding that he knows best without listening to any evidence. As a Tory who recognises the shit show that the Conservatives became over the last 14 years I actually want this government to improve things for the people of the UK. This does very little in that sense and smacks of political dogma and correctness just like some of the ridiculous over reaction post Southport.
If youā€™ve researched figures then youā€™ll surely see that smoking costs the NHS billions.

Government figures in 2017 show it was 2.6bn and you can see exactly where the costs are. Itā€™s astonishing how much they clog up GP surgeries, their cost of nurse visits, prescriptions, hospital visits and outpatient and hospital visits. Smoking is a burden on the NHS, thereā€™s no question about it.
 


Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,463
Hove
If youā€™ve researched figures then youā€™ll surely see that smoking costs the NHS billions.

Government figures in 2017 show it was 2.6bn and you can see exactly where the costs are. Itā€™s astonishing how much they clog up GP surgeries, their cost of nurse visits, prescriptions, hospital visits and outpatient and hospital visits. Smoking is a burden on the NHS, thereā€™s no question about it.
You have to applaud the argument of smokers though to say they generally die a lot earlier and therefore draw less pension. If they could make death even more sudden and requiring much less care, we could even bring smoking back inside if it makes an overall saving?
 








cunning fergus

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 18, 2009
4,885
If youā€™ve researched figures then youā€™ll surely see that smoking costs the NHS billions.

Government figures in 2017 show it was 2.6bn and you can see exactly where the costs are. Itā€™s astonishing how much they clog up GP surgeries, their cost of nurse visits, prescriptions, hospital visits and outpatient and hospital visits. Smoking is a burden on the NHS, thereā€™s no question about it.
Neurological degeneration is a relatively new kid on the NHS block and as we live longer thanks to healthier lifestyles, so the costs of dealing with it is already increasing.

According to the Alzheimerā€™s Society the current cost of dementia to the UK is forecast to be Ā£42 billion in 2024, rising to Ā£90 billion in 2040.


Smoking reduces life expectancy and in comparison to the NHS and social care costs connected to managing degenerative disease, heavy smokers should be in the annual honours lists.

As ever this ban is based on political ideology, it will increase costs on councils and hospitality to enforce it and will add another layer to the already authoritarian state.

Legislating aggressively on the health of the nation is not new, and it ironic that the U.K. is at the forefront of it given this countryā€™s more recent history with its leaders. You should know that, you live in Germany.
 




cunning fergus

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 18, 2009
4,885
I don't know how much the average smoker costs the NHS in treatment, but I doubt it's Ā£100k. The average lifelong smoker lives 10 years less than the non-smoker, which means 10 years less pension - that's Ā£100k based on the average payment per pensioner.

There are plenty of reasons for wanting people to live longer and more healthily, but it won't save the government money.
The Government has already laid the foundations on that to benefit the social care industry, so best thing to do if you have been a ā€œcitizenā€ or your parents have is hide the moneyā€¦ā€¦ā€¦.

 


wellquickwoody

Many More Voting Years
NSC Patron
Aug 10, 2007
13,911
Melbourne
I had always assumed tobacco tax pays far more than it costs the NHS but a quick google suggests it's the other way round. It's still a bit, well, long-term as a plan though. I mean nothing wrong with that while the sun is shining, but it's not - 14 years of incompetence and corruption has seen to that.
Most of the reports claiming that costs outweigh income are quoting ASH, the anti smoking lobby. About as neutral as Russian state television.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,686
The Fatherland
You have to applaud the argument of smokers though to say they generally die a lot earlier and therefore draw less pension. If they could make death even more sudden and requiring much less care, we could even bring smoking back inside if it makes an overall saving?
You have to applaud the argument of smokers though to say they generally die a lot earlier and therefore draw less pension. If they could make death even more sudden and requiring much less care, we could even bring smoking back inside if it makes an overall saving?
Agree. Itā€™s a very strange societal argumentā€¦a bit like the Alzeihmers versus smoking willy waving post above.
 


Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
58,792
hassocks
If youā€™ve researched figures then youā€™ll surely see that smoking costs the NHS billions.

Government figures in 2017 show it was 2.6bn and you can see exactly where the costs are. Itā€™s astonishing how much they clog up GP surgeries, their cost of nurse visits, prescriptions, hospital visits and outpatient and hospital visits. Smoking is a burden on the NHS, thereā€™s no question about it.


Tax from tobacco raises around 9 billion

https://obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/tobacco-duties/#:~:text=Tobacco%20duties%20are%20levied%20on,and%20Ā£302%20per%20household.


Tobacco duties are levied on purchases of cigarettes, hand-rolled tobacco, cigars and other forms of tobacco. In 2024-25 we estimate that tobacco duties will raise Ā£8.8 billion. This represents 0.8 per cent of all receipts and is equivalent to 0.3 per cent of national income, and Ā£302 per household. Duty on cigarettes accounts for the majority of all tobacco duty receipts.
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,538
Deepest, darkest Sussex


Right Brain Ronnie

Well-known member
Feb 20, 2023
634
North of North
Is there anyone in this forum still supporting Starmer?

Record low ratings at this stage, he always was a walking disaster, but to lead our country, which he doesn't even believe in, he makes me cringe when he stands by our union flag, its just another show of his deceit.

 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here