Machiavelli
Well-known member
Supplemented for you
[Albion] Tribunal orders Chelsea to pay up to £7.65million to Albion for Shim Mheuka and Zak Sturge
- Thread starter AZ Gull
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Have they spat him out already?
Should of stayed with a big club.
I guess we decided that he wasn't worth £1m to get him back. So quite nice that we have actually made more than £1m thanks to the tribunal 
portslade seagull
Well-known member
That's the issue sign for Chelsea chasing the dream and then disappear into oblivion. He would've been better to stay with us
Exactly the kind of thing that will cause talented kids to think about going elsewhere…….
AZ Gull
@SeagullsAcademy @seagullsacademy.bsky.social
- Thread starter
- #49
I guess we decided that he wasn't worth £1m to get him back. So quite nice that we have actually made more than £1m thanks to the tribunal
@Jim in the West - don't think we did make more than £1m, as @Hugo Rune has pointed out.
Gabbiano
Well-known member
Shame really, as a right back he'd have got his chance with us if he was good enough.
Anger
Well-known member
- Jul 21, 2017
- 522
Or £1.1m.
I think we’d only get 20% of the £100k profit but have no info on the technicalities of our settlement.
Baldseagull
Well-known member
We don't know if things would have worked out better for him here, but I think they probably would have.
Anger
Well-known member
- Jul 21, 2017
- 522
Ah. I missed that nuance.
Gabbiano
Well-known member
Oh, he was a left back. Not sure how I had that tangled up.
Point still stands! Full back depth was desperately needed last season, he'd probably have got a go.
Seagull on the Hill
Well-known member
- Jan 22, 2022
- 747
Both profit and percentage of the actual sale are possible. Who knows what was agreed as part of the deal
You are probably right - I’d assumed it was 20% of £1m. But a minor detail in the scheme of things. At the end of the day, annoying as his departure to Chelsea was, we didn’t actually lose out.