That's what fab keeps telling reporters (I'm not sure why though!)Jonathan Pierce on MOTD said he's been told it's not likely Gilmour will leave.
He's gone.
That's what fab keeps telling reporters (I'm not sure why though!)Jonathan Pierce on MOTD said he's been told it's not likely Gilmour will leave.
If wieffer or O'Riley are injured surely he would start ?Felt it was his best game for us.
Was it his farewell performance? No idea but he has (reportedly) said he fancies Naples so we will see.
I honestly can’t see him being more than a rotational player given the talent we are bringing in
To be fair to RDZ he didn't get a preseason to work on anything so he had to impose his style on the fly. Would we have amassed 62 points. If he'd maintained Potter's tactics and slowly transitioned? Impossible to say but probably not.
In the end we were 9 points off top 4.
I thought it was Napoli who were interested in him...Felt it was his best game for us.
Was it his farewell performance? No idea but he has (reportedly) said he fancies Naples so we will see.
I honestly can’t see him being more than a rotational player given the talent we are bringing in
Is it? In what way? Tell me what Gilmour did that was so much better than Milner? I would recommend watching the game again and looking at the stats cos I think you’ll find that as tends to happen on here because he looks busy, Gilmour’s performance and influence has been over hyped.
I know some are not interested in stats but as a point of interest, Who Scored had them level rated, Sofa Score had Milner ahead of Gilmour.
His first 3 passes in the first half all went to a united player
3 tackles won in midfield during a match is hardly match definingIf you want to look at the stats - Gilmour won the ball back with 3/3 tackles. For a player much derided for his poor defensive work he did that side of the game very well yesterday.
And if we’re looking at the stats app, FotMob had Gilmour score higher than Milner yesterday too.
Gilmour had his usual ‘busy’ game which you seemingly don’t rate, but it was his defensive work that marked him out as one of our top performers yesterday.
Based on his 'rumoured' value and possible sale price (below £20m?), it would appear that there's something missing in his locker that makes him underrated by the overall football establishment.Boils my piss, this self aggrandising bollocks. "Underrated by a lot of Brighton fans" = "I know better than you"
But that wasn’t my point- my point was that he did the defensive side of the game well yesterday, along with his busy normal self of picking up the ball and playing through the lines.3 tackles won in midfield during a match is hardly match defining
3 tackles won in midfield during a match is hardly match defining
Now I’m not an expert, but… if an £18m deal is verbally done between the Two clubs, it would be absolute madness on the clubs (and players) behalf to play him yesterday.
I just don’t see that making sense. If indeed it was true, WBG would have been nowhere near the squad let alone starting.
It would reinforce that the club are allowing the move for the player’s benefit rather than the club’s. Had he got injured yesterday and the move was aborted, that wouldn’t have been a concern for us, hence he played.Now I’m not an expert, but… if an £18m deal is verbally done between the Two clubs, it would be absolute madness on the clubs (and players) behalf to play him yesterday.
I just don’t see that making sense. If indeed it was true, WBG would have been nowhere near the squad let alone starting.
If wieffer or O'Riley are injured surely he would start ?