- Thread starter
- #341
Is that worth a review?? Yes it IS.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
World Cup: England v West Indies
- Thread starter Titanic
- Start date
Windies have none left
- Thread starter
- #343
That was CLOSE. But stays with the on field umpire. NOT OUT
Yep hitting middle stump not good enough I am afraid.
- Thread starter
- #346
Wicket maiden from Tredwell.
10-2-48-4
West Indies 222-7 (42 overs)
22 required from 48 balls, 3 wickets in hand.
10-2-48-4
West Indies 222-7 (42 overs)
22 required from 48 balls, 3 wickets in hand.
- Thread starter
- #347
Bopara keeps it tight... one inside edge on to the pads, but no joy... and that is not enough for England.
West Indies 223-7 (43 overs)
21 required from 42 balls, 3 wickets in hand.
West Indies 223-7 (43 overs)
21 required from 42 balls, 3 wickets in hand.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,319
Disgusting decision surely?
Watching on mute so couldn't hear anything re if there was an edge?
Also actually thought that catch on the boundary was out - it was his sleeve that moved - not the barrier? Someone also pointed that out on BBC...
- Thread starter
- #349
Swann to bowl his final over... and he's got him!!!!!
SARWAN is gone - caught at short leg - that turned and BOUNCED
223-8
The twists and turns continue! Blimey
SARWAN is gone - caught at short leg - that turned and BOUNCED
223-8
The twists and turns continue! Blimey
Sam Ovett
The New Manager Bus
Yes swanny!!!
No proof it did though is there, wicket should have stood.
Leekbrookgull
Well-known member
This is too much,these players are shot to bits. They should not be there,we should have sent a sort of 'A' side. Anything after the Ashes was always going to be downhill.
- Thread starter
- #354
THAT'S OUT!!!!! Great catch from TREMLETT!!!!
Roach gone without scoring
223-9
Roach gone without scoring
223-9
Sam Ovett
The New Manager Bus
And again!
