Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
Rents, Robinson and Revell or Hart.Trigger said:Slight problem with that, McGhee has left us without a Left Back & a Striker.
Rents, Robinson and Revell or Hart.Trigger said:Slight problem with that, McGhee has left us without a Left Back & a Striker.
Virgo's Haircut said:Why not?
Who would be better at left back if big Guy is back?
Redhead said:On what basis?
Richie Morris said:Lynch, like McShane last season, has held our defence together. His distribution has been better then Butters and he uses his pace to cover both full backs.
Put Butters back in and we will struggle again. You need a mix at centre half - two big lumps won't work.
Rents in at left back for me.
Seagull73 said:Kuipers is a better keeper??
Richie Morris said:Put Butters back in and we will struggle again. You need a mix at centre half - two big lumps won't work.
Rougvie said:One of the main positives of our play has been the way we have managed to distribute the ball to feet from defense which has given our play a nice fluid feel to it that we havent seen for a good few years.
Richie Morris said:Mine would be almost the same as Chappers only with Hammond on the left instead of Frutos as he would give more defensive cover to young Rents then Frutos.
Hammond had some of his best games on the left when he first broke into the team.
I would definitely introduce Fraser as a sub at some stage though.
Race said:Calm down, the LUMP wont be starting tomorrow!
Redhead said:But he's not, why do I get the feeling we've opened a can of worms?
Rougvie said:I'm sorry to hear that, we need his experience in times like these.
(He is good at LUMPing it up the park tho )