Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Why sacking doesn't succeed









jonny.rainbow

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2005
6,819
Lokki 7 said:
Not true. There was plenty of talk of him getting the chop last season, and I believe on the official Crewe website at the moment there is a poll asking fans whether he should be sacked or not.

Gradi will NEVER be sacked. Asked to move upstairs, probably, but not sacked.
 


BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
jonny.rainbow said:
Gradi will NEVER be sacked. Asked to move upstairs, probably, but not sacked.

That is the polite cheapest way of sacking a manager. No lump sum as compensation just keep paying his wages until his contract expires or he gets fed up with doing nothing and resigns for another managers job.
 
Last edited:


Spiros

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
2,375
Too far from the sun
BensGrandad said:
Brian Horton didnt leave because of a better job offer he left to be nearer his family, who live in Cheshire.
And the fact that Port Vale were in a higher division had nothing to do with it? Yeah, right
 




jonny.rainbow

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2005
6,819
Last season, of the bottom 5, Rotherham, Forest and Gillingham, having sacked managers, were relegated.

Crewe and us stayed up.
 


jonny.rainbow

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2005
6,819
BensGrandad said:
That is the polite cheapest way of sacking a manager. No lump sum as compensation just keep paying his wages until his contract expires or he gets fed up with doing nothing and resigns for another managers job.

Port Vale did the same thing with John Rudge after he'd been there donkey's years didn't they.

I think it's one of those diplomatic descisions the board have to make to please the majority of the fans.

IF he is sacked, he would make a great director of youth.
 


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,522
Chandlers Ford
jonny.rainbow said:
Last season, of the bottom 5, Rotherham, Forest and Gillingham, having sacked managers, were relegated.

Crewe and us stayed up.

Can you bounce this every day please?
 




Silent Bob

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Dec 6, 2004
22,172
jonny.rainbow said:
Last season, of the bottom 5, Rotherham, Forest and Gillingham, having sacked managers, were relegated.

Crewe and us stayed up.
Gillingham and Forest IMPROVED after sacking their managers. Rotherham didn't, but they didn't appoint anyone decent.

It was just that the previous manager's had done too bad a job for the new one's to turn it around. :rolleyes:

Basically what this should be called is "why sacking doesn't work sometimes". :rolleyes:
 


D

Deleted User X18H

Guest
fatboy said:
We have had 11 managers I believe. They have got it wrong.

McGhee
Booker
Coppell
Hinshelwood
Taylor
Adams
Wood
Horton
Gritt
Lloyd
Case
Not quite do you remember an Irishman called Brady I think.
 


scotjem

New member
Oct 25, 2003
334
Glasgow
Re: Re: Why sacking doesn't succeed

3gulls said:
So we should have stuck with Tinselhead? :eek:


We were taking a massive gamble when we appointed him.

Tried and tested managers are a much safer bet - according to the report.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here