larus said:Go and check Freddies figures in his first 10 tests. See how good he was then.
True, but at the time I was criticising him too.
larus said:Go and check Freddies figures in his first 10 tests. See how good he was then.
larus said:Why are people obsessed with having a gritty player who can drop anchor/stay put?
The Aussies have shown over the last 10-15 years (and it was suitably demostrated by Pieterson), if you start scoring runs, that is a much, much better way of getting out of a tight spot than dropping anchor. OK, there may be the odd extreme when you need to scrore 500+ over 6 sessions to win, but hey, that's so rare anyway.
If Bell is thought to be good enough by the selectors, then let him have time. After all, the selectors haven't done a bad job over the last few years have they. The same ones harping on about Thorpe were the same ones that didn't want Pieterson. Nuff said really.
Grendel said:Ok, put it another way - one of our so called specialist batsmen has a lower series batting average than Ashley Giles. Is this a good thing?
Uncle Buck said:..................... The one worry with Englands batting is that we do not seem to have an obvious gritty player who can drop anchor ................
pevenseagull said:Michael Howard Yardy!
he got an even bigger score than Bell against Bangladesh
he's becoming something of a useful spinner
most of all, he bats UGLY
Storer68 said:
Bell is a very good player who has the ability but also seems to have an unfortunate knack of attracting really good balls from top bowlers (his dismissal by Lee springs to mind)