whos better - henry or van nistlerooy

[Rambo]

Henry by a mile.

 

[Potters mate]

Both players are their clubs main goalscorer, RVN scores more goals. Playing pretty football is good for us lot to watch as i personally couldnt give a palarse what went on in the premiership, but it doesnt fill the trophy cabinet, Henrys a footballer, RVN is a goalscorer.

 

[Wilko]

In the boc then it is RVN

However in terms of 'The beautiful game' then Henry is without doubt one of the most elegant and gifted players ever.

 

[Beach Hut]

Henry - awesome player at present

 

[Citrus]

Van Nistelrooy is better in the box.

Henry is better outside it.

Simple.

 

[elbowpatches]

Henry by far, Nistlerooy benefits from his team mates and awareness in the box. Henry also has the ability to take set pieces.

 

[John Dorian]

henry by far...... van nistelrooy is really not a match with the henry ...

 

[CAFC Matt]

Henry by a mile. Van Nistlerooy is a poacher (usually) but Henry is an all round footballer and striker

 

[Locky]

Henry by a mile. Van Nistlerooy is a poacher (usually) but Henry is an all round footballer and striker

Totally Agree

 

[oneboot]

As the extract from an interview below RVN has not scored from out side the box since his transfer from Holland. Nice little fact.

Henry is FAR better as he also creates goals, if Henry was as selfish as RVN then he would have more than RVN.

Look at Andy Cole for manure he scored loads and was a donkey!


November 2003
http://www.rvn10.com/interviewlequipe.html

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

Henry of course, what a no brainer !.

 

[Bwian]

But I'm pleased they're both playing in England, and they are both happy here. In an era when so many people whinge about living in this country, it makes a refreshing change to hear about highly paid foreigners actually singing the praises of this country...

I think most people would be happy living here if they were earning 70 or 80 grand a week-shit, if I was earning that kind of money even Croydon would become bearable!