Who would win in a sprint......

[Seagulls1984]

Dicker or Hammond . Got be slowest players in the league

 

[Thunder Bolt]

It always puzzles me why people have a go at Dicker for his pace. His role is good positioning to pass the ball to the players with pace. He picks the ball up from Bridcutt and passes it to the wingers or the backs to try and open up spaces to go forward. He isn't required to run anywhere.

 

[Seagulls1984]

It always puzzles me why people have a go at Dicker for his pace. His role is good positioning to pass the ball to the players with pace. He picks the ball up from Bridcutt and passes it to the wingers or the backs to try and open up spaces to go forward. He isn't required to run anywhere.

I wasn't haven't a go at him but he is slow that is just a fact. But he is required to run that's a stupid thing to say.

 

[DarrenFreemansPerm]

Both would thrash Painter!

 

[Father Jack]

Butters was faster than Dicker and Painter!

 

[pork pie]

Both would thrash Painter!

That is an issue. Full backs need pace. We have pace to burn in midfield, what we are missing is strength and aggression.

 

[Fitzcarraldo]

That is an issue. Full backs need pace. We have pace to burn in midfield, what we are missing is strength and aggression.

I think that should be what we WERE missing. Surely both Crofts and Hammond offer strength and aggression in midfield. Crofts is also a very good ball payer, I can't really comment on Hammond as I haven't really seen him play since 2008.

 

[pork pie]

I think that should be what we WERE missing. Surely both Crofts and Hammond offer strength and aggression in midfield. Crofts is also a very good ball payer, I can't really comment on Hammond as I haven't really seen him play since 2008.

Sorry, I was meaning exactly that about "were", and was really responding to a snipe at Hammond's lack of pace.