Les Biehn said:Really? I thought he looked pony. Not saying he is, but that day he looked shocking.
Just goes to show how opinions differ eh?
Les Biehn said:Really? I thought he looked pony. Not saying he is, but that day he looked shocking.
Tooting Gull said:Let's be honest - we should be demanding a full explanation of the Turienzo fiasco, right from the first moment some bright spark in Argie-land said 'Let's try and fleece Brighton' to the current Molango-like 'non-playing player' scenario.
Including the basis for any payments to agents, their involvement generally, how he was scouted, what went wrong, what's happened since he's been here, and how we make sure it never happens again.
When you look at the amount of whingeing on here about the same old stuff, this a real f***-up that has shaped our season for the worse, and not that many people seem too bothered about it.
And the pro-McGhee posse are totally ignoring it, or at best shrugging their shoulders - to their eternal discredit. It's an accountability issue, and we shouldn't just be having DK's 'openness' when it suits him, we should have it on issues like this. The silence over Turienzo has been deafening.
It's frustrating that they will neither play him or explain why not, injury excepted, when he was such a big money signing. Is not openness the best policy when the troops are in desperate need of being rallied?
Kylies Stunt Arse said:Any possibility of Turi having the same agent as Carole and Frutos? Buy Turi's contract and get the two French wingers for f*** all? Doesn't sound like too bad a deal to me.
Titanic said:I've heard this suggested from several sources... is there any truth in it ?
Yorkie said:That's strange.
I saw him play at Lewes before the deal was signed.
He looked to have a pretty good game to me.
Kylies Stunt Arse said:I have no idea. It's just a rumour that I have heard several times myself. If it is true then I think it was worthwhile. Carole and Frutos have to be worth that much.
Yorkie said:That's strange.
I saw him play at Lewes before the deal was signed.
He looked to have a pretty good game to me.
Tooting Gull said:I actually agree with you - if that speculation were true, many fans would probably just about go for it even though we desperately needed a striker.
But in the absence of any information to the contrary, they are obviously going to assume the Turienzo deal was a one-dimensional and monumental disaster.
Yorkie said:That's strange.
I saw him play at Lewes before the deal was signed.
He looked to have a pretty good game to me.
ChapmansThe Saviour said:If it is true that he had the same agent as Frutos and Carole could we not assume that it was a sign one, sign them all agreement?
Yorkie said:That's strange.
I saw him play at Lewes before the deal was signed.
He looked to have a pretty good game to me.
Tooting Gull said:McGhee: 'He's our Peter Crouch' (July 2005)
Uncle Buck said:Although he did not look as awful as some have made out, at that Lewes game, he certainly did not look any better than what we already had and surely signings should be to better the side?
Bromley shrimp said:You make a point about team stengthening. Mine is, if he's close to being on a par with what we already have, surely he must be worth a try or is he really that much further behind in ability than say McGammon or even McPhee? My limited viewing says not.
Uncle Buck said:at this level will have a field day with players lacking a first touch, Molango?