Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
What a goal by Murray
- Thread starter NS Herald
- Start date
NS Herald
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #22
What he was trying to do was what he has done on many occasions before when he's saved us which is to act as a sweeper and help out the defense. Sadly on this occasion he misjudged coming out and by the time he commited it was too late to get back and he looked silly. More often than not he has got those situations right.
Having driven 250 miles, you missed the best bit of the whole game. That's why.
Because you would have seen a great goal. I have already said sorry to this and i will not repeat myself. (again)
Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
Or to put it another way:
You've driven 250 miles so you might as well see it through to the end, what difference does 5 more minutes of crap make?
Albion Dan
Banned
Utter rubbish. We left with 20 mins to go at 2-0. I was bored to tears with the football and had a much better time going to the pub and getting a pint in before the train home. We were never ever going to get anything out of that game so why stay?
I couldnt give a shit about a goal that we score when we are already well beaten. You can always watch it on tv when you get home.
Last edited:
See Brighton's goal of the season so far from Murray?
Support the team?!
The logical conclusion to your argument is that if we kept losing you'd stop supporting us.
Spider
New member
- Sep 15, 2007
- 3,614
I'd love to hear where that supposed logic comes from.
That was a great goal by Murray, true. Obviously Kuipers made a massive blunder for Leeds' 3rd but I thought he also looked a bit suspect for their second as well, maybe I'm being harsh but could he not have done better with that? Also, the argy-bargy was definetely that twat Leeds player's fault. It was a strong challenge by Thomson, which the player wasn't happy about, but the other player ran over just to shove Thomson in the chest and start the whole thing. Scum.
Lord Large
Keeping the faith
The man is quality.
He said that he left because we were playing badly. If we always played badly, he'd never go. Fairly basic logic there.
Spider
New member
- Sep 15, 2007
- 3,614
He said he left because we were never going to get anything out of the game. Unless you've sat through 70 minutes or so of any match you can never know whether you will get anything out of a game, even if the team has been playing badly before. True, you can never be sure until the final whistle, but 49 times out of 50 you could probably make a correct judgement if we were dead and buried. Your logic is crap.
Albion Dan
Banned
No I'll go to games but when we are away and it is obvious we have no chance of getting a point out of the game I'd rather just hit the pub rather than continue to be bored to tears. It's really not that hard to get your little head around is it?
