***** VERY IMPORTANT WARNING: Adult content on NSC

[Bozza]

Work to do - later.

 

[TonyW]

Personally, i would rather pay a tiny amount to keep NSC as everyone wants it rather than pander to Google and it's mighty control over the internet

Me too.

 

[El Presidente]

Personally, i would rather pay a tiny amount to keep NSC as everyone wants it rather than pander to Google and it's mighty control over the internet

It would be a pain in the arse to administer, lots of people would pay one year but not the next, and it would cause resentment between payers and non-payers.

 

[DTES]

Personally, i would rather pay a tiny amount to keep NSC as everyone wants it rather than pander to Google and it's mighty control over the internet

But not everyone does want it full of adult material. What about the posters that would choose a family-friendly site regardless?

 

[TonyW]

It would be a pain in the arse to administer, lots of people would pay one year but not the next, and it would cause resentment between payers and non-payers.

So don't tell us who's paid an who hasn't, lol.

 

[TonyW]

But not everyone does want it full of adult material. What about the posters that would choose a family-friendly site regardless?

Its hardly full of it to be fair.
Any censorship from anyone but the Admin and Mods is just plain wrong.

 

[Art Vs Science]

I do not care for adult material TBH either, but i would still rather pay than have Google calling any shots over us. As for payers and non payers i do not get it. Make it a (tiny) pay site to view and post and send a lovely reply to Google

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Personally I love BREASTS, but there other lots of other places to find much better pictures of them.

 

[mcshane in the 79th]

It would be a pain in the arse to administer, lots of people would pay one year but not the next, and it would cause resentment between payers and non-payers.

Exactly. You'd end up with people that have paid some cash maintaining that they can't be banned and such. Would be binfest after binfest (even more than normal)

 

[TonyW]

Personally I love BREASTS, but there other lots of other places to find much better pictures of them.

Yeah, but at least now I can say "just going on NSC for a while love"!!!

 

[Uwinsc]

I would pay a tiny amount to keep NSC going but not to keep adult material on the site. Personally I hate it and am pleased that it's going to have to be removed.

 

[theonesmith]

I know I'm digging my heels in a bit here, and yeah, most of the posts are not of great value, but sometimes an "inappropriate" bit can turn up right in the middle of a perfectly decent post.
If that could upset the plebs at google, then they aren't worth having.

Mate everyone has an opinion and it's good you're standing up for yours. I completely agree- but then can we not just go through and remove the picture, keeping the decent post? All this is such a pain in the arse, either way!

 

[El Presidente]

Whilst we're contemplating our navels, can I ask you to report all threads containing bare breasts (and anything stronger). If anyone abuses the reporting process they can look forward to a long, long ban.

Myself and at least one other mod will do our best to remove them this afternoon.

NSC has never been an 'adult material' site. Perhaps at mod towers we have been a bit too relaxed in the past, but given that Google Ads brings in over £5,000 a year it seems silly to throw away such a large revenue stream for the loss of a few dozen nipples.

I'm as fond of porn as the next man, but if I want it I go elsewhere.

 

[skipper734]

All we are suggesting is that NSC is a nipple free zone (and clam shots of course). Swearing will not be prevented, and a bit of smut I suspect is fine too.

Looking at the Ronaldo site thread that they don't like, none of the above is fine according to somebody who works for that company.

 

[TonyW]

Exactly. You'd end up with people that have paid some cash maintaining that they can't be banned and such. Would be binfest after binfest (even more than normal)

Better that than being told what you can and can't post.

 

[theonesmith]

Exactly. You'd end up with people that have paid some cash maintaining that they can't be banned and such. Would be binfest after binfest (even more than normal)

Indeed, and if it was structured as an actual subscription I'm sure there are legal aspects to take into account. Whereas a voluntary donation service is tough to enforce- as Bozza put it "it's only a pound, someone else will take care of it"

 

[TonyW]

Mate everyone has an opinion and it's good you're standing up for yours. I completely agree- but then can we not just go through and remove the picture, keeping the decent post? All this is such a pain in the arse, either way!

Yeah we could - but it won't be just the photos.
Every aspect of every post will be potentially under scutiny - not good.

 

[mcshane in the 79th]

Whilst we're contemplating our navels, can I ask you to report all threads containing bare breasts (and anything stronger).

Tricky to do whilst at work unfortunately!

 

[TonyW]

Tricky to do whilst at work unfortunately!

Go on then, I'll have a look for them!!

 

[TonyW]

I've got an idea.
Tell Google to do one, and ask Razzle to sponsor you for 5K - job sorted.