Tom Cruise

[Uncle Spielberg]

Not with Jerry Maguire as his agent.

He cannot have Jerry Maguire as his agent as he was Jerry Maguire.

 

[Zed Seagull]

Don't be so pedantic man! You'll be tellin me next its not the real Tom Cruise .........

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

He is virtually the same age as me. We were both born in August 1962. Obviously thats not where the similarities end.

 

[tonymgc]

He can play at centre back too.Would benefit us bringing him in as a squad player but can't see him wanting to come to us just to sit on the bench

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

And if he can get a young hotty nearly 20 years younger than him why the hell can't I ?.







Apart from the

looks, talent, fame, money obviously

 

[Statto]

I think he played in an away champions league game for Arsenal last christmas. I think he did ok if I remember correctly.

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

I think he played in an away champions league game for Arsenal last christmas. I think he did ok if I remember correctly.

I think that was Matt Damon to be honest.

 

[Statto]

I think that was Matt Damon to be honest.

Could have been.

 

[Guy Fawkes]

It might be viewed as Risky Business by signing someone so young as cover, but if we are only signing him on loan, then we won't be risking too much Collateral and could be Far and Away a great move for all of the parties involved

However if during his loan spell he turns out to be one of A Few Good Men and has the makings of a Legend for the Albion, will Arsenal be willing to accept The Firm offer we make for him or will they reject The Color of Money we offer?

 

[Gav1901]

Could be a good signing. It's just like when we signed Gavin Hoyte on loan because it's risky but it has proved well for our right backs.

 

[Sheebo]

More pointless look at me i've got a source shite from Gav... If it's true and he's not coming why post it?

Plus we have Paints who is a great LB so dunno why we'd want another...

 

[Sheebo]

Could be a good signing. It's just like when we signed Gavin Hoyte on loan because it's risky but it has proved well for our right backs.

Eh? Do u mean that awful player Gavin Hoyte? The one who thought he was all that? Who put little effort in?

 

[Spicy]

He was pretty good in Born on the 4th of July I thought.

But better in Top Gun although I preferred Goose "Take me to bed or lose me forever".

 

[Gav1901]

Eh? Do u mean that awful player Gavin Hoyte? The one who thought he was all that? Who put little effort in?

Gavin Hoyte is not shit, he went through a bad patch and in the last few games he started to find his form again.

 

[acrossthepond]

Could have been.

Could of been

Get it right or the grammar fascists on hear will eat you alive...

 

[Gerbil]

Gavin Hoyte is not shit, he went through a bad patch and in the last few games he started to find his form again.

He was shit.

 

[Gonzo]

He is virtually the same age as me. We were both born in August 1962. Obviously thats not where the similarities end.

So you're a mental homosexual closet-case midget too?

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

It might be viewed as Risky Business by signing someone so young as cover, but if we are only signing him on loan, then we won't be risking too much Collateral and could be Far and Away a great move for all of the parties involved

However if during his loan spell he turns out to be one of A Few Good Men and has the makings of a Legend for the Albion, will Arsenal be willing to accept The Firm offer we make for him or will they reject The Color of Money we offer?

 

[Spanish Seagulls]

So you're a mental homosexual closet-case midget too?

(Sorry US but you asked for that.)

 

[Gav1901]

He was shit.

No he wasn't, everyone just gives him shit because he went through a bad patch just like Navarro and El Abd have done. He is starting to find his form now and anyone who say Gavin Hoyte is shit clearly doesn't know football.