Mellor 3 Ward 4
Well-known member
I know it would have made no difference but how did the ref come up with only 3 minutes of injury time in the Utd game last night?
Think there were 4 subs (1 Utd and 3 Milan) that's supposed to be 2 minutes. Kaka was down for ages and there were at least two other times the game was stopped.
At the Albion last Saturday there were at least the same number of subs - could have been five actually, and Oldham were wasting time from the statt of the second half. 3 minutes again were played when it should in reality have been 6 or seven.
It's about time a ref had the balls to actually give the right amount of injury time - imagine if somebody held up a board saying 10 minutes - it might stop the time wasting.
Time for Rugby League style timekeepers etc - and we might get the right amount of time played.
Think there were 4 subs (1 Utd and 3 Milan) that's supposed to be 2 minutes. Kaka was down for ages and there were at least two other times the game was stopped.
At the Albion last Saturday there were at least the same number of subs - could have been five actually, and Oldham were wasting time from the statt of the second half. 3 minutes again were played when it should in reality have been 6 or seven.
It's about time a ref had the balls to actually give the right amount of injury time - imagine if somebody held up a board saying 10 minutes - it might stop the time wasting.
Time for Rugby League style timekeepers etc - and we might get the right amount of time played.