And this is you having a sensible debate, is it?
...and even sorrier to say Ed Balls is being proved right.
This is a wonderful theory (i.e that they are deliberately inciting panic buying). As crazy as it sounds, I cant think of any other reasonable explanation as to why they would offer such ludicrous advice.I don't know this for sure but would one way of narrowly avoiding a contraction in Q1 be to get everybody panic buying something that is taxed quite heavily in the final few days of the quarter? If so, I'd imagine what we'll see in the next few hours is ministers taking to the airwaves and telling people not to panic but to 'ssya topped up' because, of course, people would not panic buy in that situation, would they?
Presumably come late June we'll be informed of a looming shortage of cigarettes.
Or am I being too paranoid/giving the Govt too much Machiavellian credit?
... I am very sad to say they are a crushing dissapointment as I brought their shit and even sorrier to say Ed Balls is being proved right.
This is a wonderful theory (i.e that they are deliberately inciting panic buying). As crazy as it sounds, I cant think of any other reasonable explanation as to why they would offer such ludicrous advice.
saying a sound bite "too far, too fast" constantly while not having any actual policy, is not being proved right. And in reality there has been no shock and awe, some have said thats precisely the problem it is the half way house and not really done anything - the deficit is still huge, the debt continues to rise. the lack of policy to promote growth is the problem.
This is a wonderful theory (i.e that they are deliberately inciting panic buying). As crazy as it sounds, I cant think of any other reasonable explanation as to why they would offer such ludicrous advice.
Perhaps also to cause a shortage so that any sympathy for the tanker drivers case is weakened before they have even decided to strike?
Not necessarilly. There are plenty of other ways that companies can cut costs rather than outsourcing. If they do it correctly they will be more profitable, enabling them to create more jobs in UK.
Plenty of companies who jumped on the outsourcing bandwagon are regretting it, it doesn't work for all companies.
What exactly are the tanker drivers striking about?
Cutting jobs, and cutting back to work schemes. What did they think would happen?
Only being paid about £44,000 a year, FFS!
They consider it a dangerous job, how many Tanker Drivers have died in the last three years compared with HGV Drivers as a % of the industry?
How many Fireman, Policemen, Soldiers, Construction Workers etc
This is the Tories we're talking about. They knew exactly what would happen but just didn't give a shit.
The UK is now back in recession it is official
The UK is back in recession with negative growth expected in Q1 2012, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development claims.
so in the main it's about conditions? and this in one of the safest/heath n safety countries in Europe to work in-perhaps they should try working abroad
THat's right - of course - that's an undoubted fact you have posted there isnt it? They did not give a shit. Jesus.
Indeed, and for the task of pointing a truck in the right direction they get an average of £44,000, whereas, I'd estimate, the average HGV driver gets around £22-25k.
Seems to me they are doing not to badly at all.