The Large One
Who's Next?
...is quite appalling.
Could we only have literate, coherent, articulate drivel, please? Threads and replies need to be written in full sentences containing a subject, object, an active verb, and featuring a well thought out intelligent term of abuse.
I am not one of those pedants who would argue the case for or against splitting infinitives; a rule made up by snobbish scholars who believed that an out-of-date, unused and largely irrelevant language should govern the rules of sentence construction, vocabulary and grammar.
However, the use of punctuation, especially the apostrophe, is quite scandalous. It should be used for contraction (e.g. "you're" for "you are", "it's" for "it is"), or for possession relating to the noun (e.g. Dave's) - but not the pronoun (e.g. its, his, hers).
Get it right, you illiterate wankers.
Could we only have literate, coherent, articulate drivel, please? Threads and replies need to be written in full sentences containing a subject, object, an active verb, and featuring a well thought out intelligent term of abuse.
I am not one of those pedants who would argue the case for or against splitting infinitives; a rule made up by snobbish scholars who believed that an out-of-date, unused and largely irrelevant language should govern the rules of sentence construction, vocabulary and grammar.
However, the use of punctuation, especially the apostrophe, is quite scandalous. It should be used for contraction (e.g. "you're" for "you are", "it's" for "it is"), or for possession relating to the noun (e.g. Dave's) - but not the pronoun (e.g. its, his, hers).
Get it right, you illiterate wankers.
Last edited: