Much better that you just go “fuffer, bleargh, PILLAR BOXES, umph, HAW HAW, hurgh, GET BREXIT DONE, phurph, bugger, blah” with no notes at all.Why can't starmer finish a 5 sentence speech without looking at said speech 5 times?
Much better that you just go “fuffer, bleargh, PILLAR BOXES, umph, HAW HAW, hurgh, GET BREXIT DONE, phurph, bugger, blah” with no notes at all.Why can't starmer finish a 5 sentence speech without looking at said speech 5 times?
Boris was/is a moron, but it’s hardly a high benchmark to be a better public speaker than him is it…Much better that you just go “fuffer, bleargh, PILLAR BOXES, umph, HAW HAW, hurgh, GET BREXIT DONE, phurph, bugger, blah” with no notes at all.
View attachment 189669
In the opinion of every moron who voted for him in 2019 he was CHARISMATIC.Boris was/is a moron, but it’s hardly a high benchmark to be a better public speaker than him is it…
Well, he has more personality than Starmer, but that’s not necessarily a good thing. A loud, incompetent colleague has more charisma than a quiet, efficient one but it doesn’t make them better. Johnson fooled the electorate with his bumbling, coy act but privately had a nasty streak. He was, undoubtedly though, charismatic. Just not in any way I’d want as a PM.In the opinion of every moron who voted for him in 2019 he was CHARISMATIC.
Empty vessels really do make more noise.Well, he has more personality than Starmer, but that’s not necessarily a good thing. A loud, incompetent colleague has more charisma than a quiet, efficient one but it doesn’t make them better. Johnson fooled the electorate with his bumbling, coy act but privately had a nasty streak. He was, undoubtedly though, charismatic. Just not in any way I’d want as a PM.
Or (for the Magic Grandpa fans on this thread) Starmer is now PM because Corbyn lost to a Latin quoting, aristocratic moron.Additionally, in 2019 he was up against Corbyn. He won votes by virtue of not being Corbyn.
"Just because you are a character doesn't mean you have character." - The WolfWell, he has more personality than Starmer, but that’s not necessarily a good thing. A loud, incompetent colleague has more charisma than a quiet, efficient one but it doesn’t make them better. Johnson fooled the electorate with his bumbling, coy act but privately had a nasty streak. He was, undoubtedly though, charismatic. Just not in any way I’d want as a PM.
Great film!"Just because you are a character doesn't mean you have character." - The Wolf