Lynch and Elphick at the back, shouldn't really be too much of a problem, should it?
Lots of potential but no maturity against one of the top teams in the division...
... bugger!
Lynch and Elphick at the back, shouldn't really be too much of a problem, should it?
Wasn't a problem at Elland Road or the City Ground?
It's great to have the choice between 3 quality centre backs.
Don't forget Virgo as well.
AND if Kuipers keeps his current form, shouldn't be any problems in defence this year.
Yes it is a bit of a problem not having Hawkins.
We didn't have Hawkins then.
But it's almost as if people think Elphick and Lynch have turned shit since Hawkins arrived.
People tend to forget they were both bloody good last season, suggesting we should have a decent backline with or without 'The Hawk'.
Anyway, it's Michel who's been keeping us in games more than the defence this season.
we might not see so much hoofing this saturday then
we might not see so much hoofing this saturday then
we might not see so much hoofing this saturday then
Well given that Elphick is the source of most the hoofing we probably wont be far off.
Not on Tuesday nights first half performance.
But it's almost as if people think Elphick and Lynch have turned shit since Hawkins arrived.
People tend to forget they were both bloody good last season, suggesting we should have a decent backline with or without 'The Hawk'.
Anyway, it's Michel who's been keeping us in games more than the defence this season.
No I don't think they're shit at all. They are good, but we've now been offered something better.
With regards to last season I personally thought it was Kuipers who should of got Player of the Season as he was the one who was 'bloody good'.
Should have gone to Forster IMO. Whilst Kuipers and Elphick were brilliant, Forster was the main reason we were so far up the league.
elphick?