Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
I think he left the design in his back pocket when his trousers went in the wash.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
The Gehry Towers, Let's make it happen!
- Thread starter Herr Tubthumper
- Start date
chip
Well-known member
What a pile of crap. How can families live and grow in such a place? Without families it will just be full of transients and that will be great for the community.
People need gardens, space, light and some separation from each other. Unless they cost £400 000/unit they will just become another slum.
People need gardens, space, light and some separation from each other. Unless they cost £400 000/unit they will just become another slum.
The Gehry Towers has the potential to benefit Brighton & Hove in the same way as the Guggenheim benefitted Bilbao - iconic buildings for iconic cities!
Edward Scissorhands
New member
- Feb 20, 2005
- 6,979
maffew = NIMBY
- Thread starter
- #25
chip said:
Remember that Brighton and Hove is a city. This is city living. There will be houses, I believe 10 will even be equipped for people with disabilities. I'm not sure about gardens but there will be space, plenty of light and seperation. At least as much as the rest of central Brighton and Hove, if not more. There are numerous other tower blocks in central Hove, none of these can be described as slums.
Families live and grow in similar environments all across Europe. I'm sure we will cope. If you want large rolling gardens, acres of space and seperation living in a city probably isn't the best idea. Maybe try the countryside?
Further, central Brighton and Hove has a rich history of 'transients,' the city is full of transients and the city has grown, evolved and blossomed due to such people. Further, the city's main income is mainly based on transience through the various service trades we provide. Brighton and Hove is a transient city whether you like it or not.
turienzo's lovechild
New member
- Oct 25, 2003
- 23,964
surrey jim said:Was the architect pissed??
it won't be that big, the tower is a fair distance from those flats
i think it looks kool
dougdeep
New member
How will they clean the outsides?
chip
Well-known member
Tubthumper said:
Ever been to Peckham?
Lord Bracknell
On fire
These days, EVERY new house should be equipped for people with disabilities.Tubthumper said:
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,827
look, put it this way. If a planning application was put forward today for the Pavillion, there would be howls of protest "its gashtly, whats the point of it", "it doesnt fit with the victorian terraces" (there wouldnt be any georgian ones...). The Pavillion set Brighton apart from all the other armpit coast "resorts" along the south.
Billy the Fish
Technocrat
That's fair enough but don't they mainly live in kemptownTubthumper said:
dougdeep
New member
Looks more like a Ford Transient to me.
Blue&WhiteSea
Well-known member
chip said:
So I guess everyone that lives in blocks all accross the british coast are considered to be slumming it then? Get real you lot are as bad as the f***ing nimby's stopping us having our stadium!
How many of the people protesting against it will be able to see it from their houses that they will probably occupy for about a maximum of 10 years before they realise that they can actually afford a proper house if they move away from all the shitty wine bars and restaurants!
The towers will be class. Another iconic building for the city to go with the Pavilion, the Pier, and Falmer.
Stop being Nimby's and move with the times. If nothing else you'll piss off Selma Montford from the Regency Society [if indeed that was the old hag's name].
Stop being Nimby's and move with the times. If nothing else you'll piss off Selma Montford from the Regency Society [if indeed that was the old hag's name].
maffew
Well-known member
Referee!!! said:
I guess so. Though moving from Hove anyway so wont affect me. Some of his stuff is quite cool though I dont think the seafront is the place for buildings that tall whether they look good or not. Though the King Alfred area definately needs ripping down and re-doing. Also I cant see it being affordable housing for anyone other than people who commute to Londondougdeep
New member
I see the proposed tower block at the Marina has been refered back to John Prescott for approval. At least that one is pleasing to the eye.
Richard Whiteley
New member
- Sep 24, 2003
- 585
what a bunch of f***ing luddite nimbys some of you are.
Reckon it would look fantastic.
Reckon it would look fantastic.
Man of Harveys
Well-known member
They'd look great, they'd be hugely popular to live in and they'd be yet another thing which sets Brighton and Hove apart from the relative drabness of the rest of the UK. I hope I'm wrong but I doubt they'll get permission, for that same reason though. 
34064 Fighter Command
New member
Pic of the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao :
aftershavedave
Well-known member
i've made this point on here before, it's one which doesn't seem to have been picked up by either camp, the arguments being either that the towers "look crap" or that they are "fantastic", but what about parking?
I live about 500 metres from the proposed location and think they look wonderful. a true addition to our city.
BUT building something like 1200 flats with only enoughparking for 600 cars is not acceptable. the developers should be obliged to put adequate parking into their plans and only then will i support them.
I live about 500 metres from the proposed location and think they look wonderful. a true addition to our city.
BUT building something like 1200 flats with only enoughparking for 600 cars is not acceptable. the developers should be obliged to put adequate parking into their plans and only then will i support them.