Not bol exactly, or a claim. It's often the case when a homosexual is asked when they first knew they were gay, the response is "I was 13 or 14. We were in love and he was much older, so he taught me to be comfortable about it" and stuff like that. Actually the same goes for some pre-legal girls, though perhaps it doesn't determine their prefrence so distinctly(?) Either way it is 'grooming' and it is done by a nonce who gains the trust of a child - a child at the finding-out period of their own sexual curiosity.
I know one gay lad and he told me his discovery was this way. George Michael may be a confirmed gay man but his account is similar.
Nonces have victims, and those children have to face a future and have their experiences make sense to them.
It's a fact of their lives that they somehow reconcile, with sexuality (often cause for guilt and confusion). Nonces can use that, which makes their behavior all the more reprehensible and their knowing grooming deserving of harsh punishments. Priests and celebs are not to be sympathized with or understood - no margins given by society or governing body! (so as to speak)
Just so we're clear, what it sounds like you're saying here in this thread is
"All/most gay people are only gay because they were abused and made to think they are"
"Young girls who are abused don't have their sexuality changed"
"A 17 year old having sex with a 15 has the same effect as a fully grown adult having sex with a prepubescent child because the law defines both as illegal, technically"
Because those are ridiculous claims, and you've had one or two people seemingly take what you've said that way, and it could turn into a binfest, so I wanted to give you the chance to clarify if this isn't what you mean.
If that is what you mean, well... *gets the Pringles in*