Watching MotD on Saturday night there was a game where a player went down injured but the opposition carried on playing, which is always a bit controversial.
It reminded me that we did the same thing on Saturday when a Leicester defender went down on the edge of the area. Schmeichel attempted to kick the ball out but failed to do so, and we just carried on. Play was brought to a halt when a Leicester player made a very intentional foul on one of ours - I can't remember who - as we sought to attack.
If the positions had been reversed, we'd have been calling for the ref to be shot, but because we were looking to profit it sort of feels justifiable.
Is it OK to carry on when an opponent is injured and the opposition want play to be halted?
(No poll to follow)
It reminded me that we did the same thing on Saturday when a Leicester defender went down on the edge of the area. Schmeichel attempted to kick the ball out but failed to do so, and we just carried on. Play was brought to a halt when a Leicester player made a very intentional foul on one of ours - I can't remember who - as we sought to attack.
If the positions had been reversed, we'd have been calling for the ref to be shot, but because we were looking to profit it sort of feels justifiable.
Is it OK to carry on when an opponent is injured and the opposition want play to be halted?
(No poll to follow)