Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
SSN - Gus Poyet says Albion Close to Loan for KLL
- Thread starter dingodan
- Start date
clippedgull
Hotdogs, extra onions
I can live with that if we can't agree a permanent switch. Newcastle obviously want to see how he steps up to the next level.
deletebeepbeepbeep
Well-known member
- May 12, 2009
- 21,649
It's probably for the best 1.5m is a lot to invest in a potentially crocked player, if a loan is successful we get KLL + 1.5m to spend on another player. Not a bad thing.
I'm not so sure about that, if that was the case then why would we have been negotiating with them for so long about a permanent deal? I would have thought it was more along the lines of us saying we're not paying the £1.3 million or whatever was agreed because he failed his medical, so we'll either pay less money or we'll take him on loan and see how his ankle holds out before paying that kind of money.
mejonaNO12 aka riskit
Well-known member
He is free in the summer as he will be out of contract.
Loan with view to signing in Jan is a possibility though.
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Not free, as he's under 24 so there will still be a fee of some sort next summer.
As long as we get first dibs on him in January I'll be happy enough with this.
As long as we get first dibs on him in January I'll be happy enough with this.
Wilka
Well-known member
The only worry if we do loan him is if he carries on being really good other clubs will come in for him.
clippedgull
Hotdogs, extra onions
That would hold up if he has in fact failed a medical, but unless I missed it, that hasn't been the official line from us? But would make sense if he has failed one.
¤DãŃn¥ §êãGüLL¤
Banned
This is getting boring now. So boring I could poo my leg off.
But why would we get first dibs? If he's with us on loan and does well, 101 clubs will be after him in January and we won't stand a chance.
mejonaNO12 aka riskit
Well-known member
ah, i meant 'free' in terms of out of contract.
A 'fee' of such would be set by tribunal if we can't agree.
From what i'm guessing, the whole negotiation is probably haggling over the fee in terms of what Newcastle feel he is worth in a tribunal outcome, if that makes any sense. I honestly don't believe they have ANY desire to keep him, but they wont let him go for a fee which they could do better with if they leave it to the tribunal.
Basically The Toon are in win/win either way.
severnside gull
Well-known member
re-hash of yesterday's OS report - a complete non-story in terms of there being any further progress on whether we are definitely going to get him on loan rather than on a permanent deal. I still feel it's a case of us having a view of his value and Newcastle having a much much higher figure in mind ......we may well end up saying "OK let's loan him for next season then go to a tribunal to set his value once his contract has expired" - end of the day you suspect a deal would then be done in January at a sensible compromise fee.
Hardly justifies a new thread does it?
Hardly justifies a new thread does it?
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
I'm not saying we automatically would, but I'd hope it would be part of the deal that we get first refusal on him in January. Newcastle may not agree to that as obviously its within their interests for there to be an auction on him, but who knows.
Hopefully this loan deal will see him settled at the club and wanting to sign a permanent deal. We want him, he wants us, in all likelihood it'll happen (assuming he's not been plagued with injuries of course).
Uncle C
Well-known member
Yet another NSC rumour that has become fact.
No I don't think it is official, but I don't think Newcastle would want us revealing that kind of information. I'm only going on what I've read on here, but that does seem to be the general view.
I wasn't saying it was a fact, but it does seem to be the general view.