Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

so who are not good enough for BHA

not good enough?

  • Kuipers

    Votes: 7 6.5%
  • Whing

    Votes: 21 19.6%
  • Elphick

    Votes: 2 1.9%
  • Hawkins

    Votes: 75 70.1%
  • Richard

    Votes: 18 16.8%
  • Thomson

    Votes: 47 43.9%
  • Thornton

    Votes: 4 3.7%
  • Johnson

    Votes: 15 14.0%
  • Forster

    Votes: 4 3.7%
  • Murray

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Anyinsah

    Votes: 29 27.1%
  • Fleetwood

    Votes: 61 57.0%
  • All of them

    Votes: 6 5.6%

  • Total voters
    107


ali jenkins

Thanks to Guinness Dave
Feb 9, 2006
9,896
Southwick
I only voted for Hawkins because the rest have either proved that they are good enough for this league and are just in poor form at the moment, or I havent seen them enough times to make a good judgement
 




Voice of Reason

New member
Jan 7, 2006
245
Hailsham
Duff poll because there isn't a 'none of them' option. They are all good League One players. They obviously aren't playing well together with any consistency but they all have the ability.

Agreed. Definite flaw.???
 


Giraffe

VERY part time moderator
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Aug 8, 2005
26,946
Out of that list just Hawkins and Fleetwood. Particualrly Fleetwood as to me he is no better than Robinson, and as such rather than developing our own talent we are developing Charlton's which makes no sense to me.
 


clippedgull

Hotdogs, extra onions
Aug 11, 2003
20,789
Near Ducks, Geese, and Seagulls
Out of that list just Hawkins and Fleetwood. Particualrly Fleetwood as to me he is no better than Robinson, and as such rather than developing our own talent we are developing Charlton's which makes no sense to me.

Hopefully Robinson will be gone by the start of next season, if not sooner.

The guy just has not shown any scope for improving with us. Might do him good to drop down a division.
 


Lewes' best seagull

New member
Jan 31, 2008
1,145
They're all good enough, including Hawkins. If played in their CORRECT positions and not played when injured, they're all good enough for this standard.

Oh alright, Fleetwood is f***ing hopeless. But the rest are League One (and above in some cases) standard.

exactly :clap::clap:

For a few games Hawkins has been good and

What idiot voted for forster?:nono:
 






HseagullsH

NSC's tipster
May 15, 2008
3,192
Brighton
Hawkins and Fleetwood.

As for Thomson, he is a good footballer but i feel we now need a big physical holding player to command the midfield.

There is no leadership in the midfield...
 








Braders

Abi Fletchers Gimpboy
Jul 15, 2003
29,224
Brighton, United Kingdom
Richards easily , possibly Fleetwood ..
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
61,753
The Fatherland
What about the coaching staff?
 






GDC

In A Checked Shirt
Nov 7, 2006
189
On A Train
Whcih cunts have voted Johnson?
 


Braders

Abi Fletchers Gimpboy
Jul 15, 2003
29,224
Brighton, United Kingdom
how the HELL has Whingy got so many votes against him? - him and Elphick ARE our defence at the moment!!! (Hawkins is GOOD when FIT , give him a break and let him get better)
 




Deano's Invisible Pants

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2008
1,133
how the HELL has Whingy got so many votes against him? - him and Elphick ARE our defence at the moment!!! (Hawkins is GOOD when FIT , give him a break and let him get better)

Sorry, but Whing has been HOPELESS in recent games and was particularly dire against MK Dons. He is laughably short of the required level of ability at this level. Elphick is a better player but has been part of a failing defence for weeks and, again, was very much at fault against MK Dons.
 


Mar 4, 2008
400
Burgess Hill!
Richards and Fleetwood, although I think Fleetwood is just being played out of position but still not better than Murray or Forster
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here