Seasider78
Well-known member
- Nov 14, 2004
- 6,001
I don't think anyone is glad we lost Revell as a few have pointed out he would have been good backup for Murray and Forster but lets be honest 150k offer for a utility player was a bit too much to resist!
The problem for me is the replacement backup we acquired (Dixon) who to be honest does not look half the player Revell was. For 75k looks like we have been done in the same way we did getting Southend to part with 150k for Alex
The problem for me is the replacement backup we acquired (Dixon) who to be honest does not look half the player Revell was. For 75k looks like we have been done in the same way we did getting Southend to part with 150k for Alex