1.And since when does a post on Nsc need a point? If that was the case my post count would be 2
And that was probably something about Nick Cave.
1.And since when does a post on Nsc need a point? If that was the case my post count would be 2
I think a poster on the Doncaster message board was successfully sued for libel last year. My memory's not perfect so it may have been a different club; I don't know whether the wronged party was a club director.
More importantly, should we be referring to this latest issue as Adengate, Nazigate, Chapmangate or Stargate?
More importantly, should we be referring to this latest issue as Adengate, Nazigate, Chapmangate or Stargate?
Isn't Stargate the place where the tram to Fleetwood starts?
The evening argus quotes a boss who saysa that turnover is down 90% and he's laid off 80% of his workforce. Subsequently a bloke on here says that he hears the company is in trouble. I see no libel there.
And since when does a post on nsc need a point? If that was the case my post count would be 2
Uncle Spielberg only owns the film rights to NSC threadsIs Uncle Spielberg involved? Then it could be Garethgate.
I think you also made the point that Howard out the Halifax advert was a f***ing twat. Although that might not have been you come to think of it.f*** off. It was definitely 2. I think it was about the milf from the sainsburys advert that was the other one.
The real issue is that people close to the club are deleting threads. This isn't Croydon
I think that Saddam Hussein was hung for genocide and crimes against humanity. So WHAT?
I was trying to answer a question from Beach Hut - so sorry.
Hiney restored our faith.I've been away all week. What the f*** is going on, please thank you.
Yes I know. But you failed, miserably. I think we all already understood that it is possible for people to sue other people and sometimes win.
Sorry again. Btw is this the NSC "we" that was mentioned on the deleted thread?
The Argus article was published three weeks ago and the original post asserted (imo) considerably more than "the company is in trouble".The evening argus quotes a boss who saysa that turnover is down 90% and he's laid off 80% of his workforce. Subsequently a bloke on here says that he hears the company is in trouble. I see no libel there.
And since when does a post on nsc need a point? If that was the case my post count would be 2
The Argus article was published three weeks ago and the original post asserted (imo) considerably more than "the company is in trouble".
Actually, I can see a point to initiating the thread, if you are a competitor.